2019
DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2019.1604304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect on wettability of the topography and oxidation state of biaxially oriented poly(propylene) film

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned above, the plasma of atmospheric PSJ was filamentary, and thus the treatment was not perfectly homogeneous. Small local domains of PP fabric could remained untreated, affecting the measured WCAs highly sensitive to the lower-energy part of surface areas [ 58 ]. A slightly less hydrophobic surface was achieved after treatment with the Ar+N mixture (113.7 versus 116.5°, Figure S3a,c ) which can be associated with a higher amount of oxygen compared to the Ar treatment, but the difference is not significant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, the plasma of atmospheric PSJ was filamentary, and thus the treatment was not perfectly homogeneous. Small local domains of PP fabric could remained untreated, affecting the measured WCAs highly sensitive to the lower-energy part of surface areas [ 58 ]. A slightly less hydrophobic surface was achieved after treatment with the Ar+N mixture (113.7 versus 116.5°, Figure S3a,c ) which can be associated with a higher amount of oxygen compared to the Ar treatment, but the difference is not significant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 39 ] On any commercial synthetic polymers, there is always a contact angle hysteresis (ACA > $\gt $ RCA). [ 40 ] The hysteresis of our untreated PP was (22±3) ${(22\pm 3)}^{\circ }$. It is likely a result of a combination of surface roughness and polypropylene semi‐crystalline character, with the crystalline regions acting as the higher energy and amorphous regions as the lower energy components of the surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely a result of a combination of surface roughness and polypropylene semi‐crystalline character, with the crystalline regions acting as the higher energy and amorphous regions as the lower energy components of the surface. [ 40 ] The WCA hysteresis remained unchanged or even decreased after the PT‐RPJ treatment at 5 or 10 mm of the axial distance between the sample surface and the nozzle, pointing to excellent treatment uniformity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results from the AFM measurement revealed the low degree of roughness of raw BOPP foil with a value of 5.0 nm comparable to other papers. Strobel et al [ 23 ] observed RMS roughness values in the range 2.3–4.3 nm for various types of BOPP differing in orientation. Another paper by Chen et al [ 24 ] measured RMS roughness of 3.8 nm, and Darvish et al [ 25 ] published roughness of BOPP film with a value of 6.8 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%