2002
DOI: 10.1006/jmsc.2002.1229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective and accurate use of difference in mean volume backscattering strength to identify fish and plankton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
90
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in a mission south of Catalina Is., CA in September, 2013, there was an acoustic scattering layer at approximately 300 m. At the range this feature is sampled, the ship-based sensor had a horizontal footprint of 37-40 m while the AUV sensor, flying 4 m above the layer, had a footprint of 0.6-3.7 m. The increased resolution means one can now resolve individuals rather than simply the layer at these depths ( Figure 3). The multiple frequencies also allow for classification of the individuals into taxonomic categories and size estimates [30,31]. This system, therefore, makes it possible to examine the biology of animals in the mesopelagic zone in ways previously only possible in the upper ocean.…”
Section: Advantages Of Using An Auv As a Platform For Echosoundersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a mission south of Catalina Is., CA in September, 2013, there was an acoustic scattering layer at approximately 300 m. At the range this feature is sampled, the ship-based sensor had a horizontal footprint of 37-40 m while the AUV sensor, flying 4 m above the layer, had a footprint of 0.6-3.7 m. The increased resolution means one can now resolve individuals rather than simply the layer at these depths ( Figure 3). The multiple frequencies also allow for classification of the individuals into taxonomic categories and size estimates [30,31]. This system, therefore, makes it possible to examine the biology of animals in the mesopelagic zone in ways previously only possible in the upper ocean.…”
Section: Advantages Of Using An Auv As a Platform For Echosoundersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33) Therefore, the frequency response obtained by a multi-frequency echo sounder 21,34) , is theoretically reasonable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Volume scattering was averaged over cells of 5 m depth and 5 echoes wide from 5 m below the surface to 0.5 m from the bottom or to 100 m depth, whichever was shallower. The binned volume scattering at 38 kHz was subtracted from that at 120 kHz to categorize data as either swimbladdered fish or euphausiids based on the observed frequency response (Kang et al 2002, Korneliussen & Ona 2002. Cells designated as 'fish' had a S v120 to S v38 in the range of −9.3 to 9.3 dB; cells categorized as 'euphausiids' were within the range of 9.3 to 30 dB (De Robertis 2010). ])…”
Section: Acoustic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%