2015
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cvi.2013.0242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective background modelling and subtraction approach for moving object detection

Abstract: This study presents a hierarchical background modelling and subtraction approach for real‐time detection of moving objects. At the first level, a novel pixel‐wise background modelling method is proposed for coarse detection. The method can dynamically assign the optimal number of components for each pixel with the borrow–lend strategy. And a flexible learning rate which is variable and different for each component is presented to adapt to scene changes. Additionally, a new mechanism using a framework of finite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 10 includes the detected regions with their PCC factor details for objects 1, 2 and 3 depending to tables (8)(9) and equation (5). The given PCC results in table (10), exhibited that using the Prewitt Edge technique to detect the samples used objects is achieved best results in compared with the Sobel edge technique, the differences of the PCC between Sobel and Prewitt techniques are appeared more clearly in figure 25.…”
Section: Fig 24: Processing Time Comparison For Edges Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 10 includes the detected regions with their PCC factor details for objects 1, 2 and 3 depending to tables (8)(9) and equation (5). The given PCC results in table (10), exhibited that using the Prewitt Edge technique to detect the samples used objects is achieved best results in compared with the Sobel edge technique, the differences of the PCC between Sobel and Prewitt techniques are appeared more clearly in figure 25.…”
Section: Fig 24: Processing Time Comparison For Edges Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The background is very important for any moving object detection and considered as a key of any video surveillance or automatic video analyses [10], the background is modeled using many captured images then the average operation has to be applied to obtained the background modeling, Figure (18), the foreground are also modeled and combined with the background, Figures (19-21)), this mechanism is applied for all the three used object and the following results as shown in table(3) are obtained.…”
Section: International Journal Of Computer Applications (0975 -8887) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach is the calculation of the optical flow [3], [4] which provides all information about the movement, but the real-time implementation is difficult and calculation of flow being generally slow. The background subtraction approaches start by modeling the background(model of static scene), it can detect the most precise foreground [5][6] [ [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], , but it has many limitations like sensor noise (noise of acquisition and digitization) and management of homogeneous areas when the luminance difference between two moments is less than a threshold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of pixel for modelling background, background model can be classified into pixel-based model [7][8][9][10][11][12] and region-based model. [13][14][15][16][17][18] The pixelbased methods model observed scenes as a set of independent pixel processes, while the region-based methods represent background model by using inter-pixel relations. Among these methods, one of the most widely used methods for background modelling is the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Panda and Meher, 17 a novel fuzzy colour difference histogram was proposed to represent the background, it exhibited better performance over many background subtraction methods in terms of classification accuracy metrics. The hierarchical method was presented in Liu et al 18 In which, the first level is a pixel-wise background modelling method for coarse detection, while the second level is a refined detection based on a block-wise foreground validation. The method can improve the foreground detection results, yet it is still difficult for dynamic background.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%