2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.04.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective correction of experimental errors in quantitative proteomics using stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)

Abstract: Accurate and reliable quantitative proteomics in cell culture has been considerably facilitated by the introduction of the stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC), combined with high resolution mass spectrometry. There are however several major sources of quantification errors that commonly occur with SILAC techniques, i.e. incomplete incorporation of isotopic amino acids, arginine-to-proline conversion, and experimental errors in final sample mixing. Dataset normalization is a widely ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess molecular signatures consistent with improved vascular health following Resv supplementation, vascular smooth muscle (VSM) cells from the monkey aorta were isolated, placed in primary culture and then were subjected to quantitative proteomics by stable isotope labeling with amino acids (SILAC) combined with LC-MS/MS, as previously reported (Park et al, 2012). Of the 750 proteins identified, expression of 121 proteins significantly differed in either the HFS and/or HFS+R compared to SD (Table S3C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess molecular signatures consistent with improved vascular health following Resv supplementation, vascular smooth muscle (VSM) cells from the monkey aorta were isolated, placed in primary culture and then were subjected to quantitative proteomics by stable isotope labeling with amino acids (SILAC) combined with LC-MS/MS, as previously reported (Park et al, 2012). Of the 750 proteins identified, expression of 121 proteins significantly differed in either the HFS and/or HFS+R compared to SD (Table S3C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be overcome by increasing the concentration of proline in the media as described by Park et al [30]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional features have also been included for quantification using metabolic labeling (e.g., 15 N, SILAC). Among these are the calculation of a reverse ratio for the label swap experimental setup [56, 57] and the assessment of the statistical significance of differentially expressed peptides. More recently, improvements were implemented in Census 2 for the calculation of 15 N enrichment ratios.…”
Section: Computational Pipelinementioning
confidence: 99%