2021
DOI: 10.1049/rpg2.12331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective demand response and GANs for optimal constraint unit commitment in solar‐tidal based microgrids

Abstract: A new approach for optimal demand response program (DRP) in the microgrid considering the high penetration of the solar energy and tidal units as significant and popular renewable sources in the system is proposed here. The proposed method makes use of a multi-objective problem (MOP) to not only minimize the total operation cost of the scheduling problem but also mitigate the high risk of the interruption in power delivery due to the components failure rate and long repairing rates. Considering the high comple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (17), TP = true positives, TN = true negatives, FP = false positives, and FN = false negatives. Precision and recall are calculated as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In (17), TP = true positives, TN = true negatives, FP = false positives, and FN = false negatives. Precision and recall are calculated as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to these differences, renewable energy sources are becoming more common in DNs [16][17][18]. These sources typically introduce higher variance and inconsistency, making it more difficult to perform state estimation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparison, robust method and fuzzy chance constraint method essentially only need to calculate one scenario, so their calculation time is very small, but the results tend to be conservative, resulting in an increase in total operating costs. Compared with the literature [36], there are several differences: (1). The objects of scheduling are different: this paper focuses on the load side, i.e., manufacturing enterprises, with the lowest production cost as the objective function; [36] focuses on the power system side, with the lowest generation cost as the objective function; (2).…”
Section: B Calculation Efficiency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the literature [36], there are several differences: (1). The objects of scheduling are different: this paper focuses on the load side, i.e., manufacturing enterprises, with the lowest production cost as the objective function; [36] focuses on the power system side, with the lowest generation cost as the objective function; (2). The methods of problem solving are different: in this paper, the scheduling model is modeled using MILP using the STN method, which can be directly solved using commercial solvers; mathematical model in [36] can be solved using multi-objective and multi-stage optimization algorithms.…”
Section: B Calculation Efficiency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the consumer's point of view, the MG can increase reliability, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve power quality, and from power generation companies' point of view, it can eliminate peak consumption points, reduce power loss, reduce operation costs, etc. [1][2][3][4]. Moreover, the development of MG is able to aid to supply remote loads when the proper distributions or transmission infrastructure are not available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%