2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-019-3287-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective machine-learning assembly for next-generation amplicon sequencing with very low coverage

Abstract: BackgroundIn short-read DNA sequencing experiments, the read coverage is a key parameter to successfully assemble the reads and reconstruct the sequence of the input DNA. When coverage is very low, the original sequence reconstruction from the reads can be difficult because of the occurrence of uncovered gaps. Reference guided assembly can then improve these assemblies. However, when the available reference is phylogenetically distant from the sequencing reads, the mapping rate of the reads can be extremely lo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…robustus (Janke et al, 1997), M . fuliginosus (Ranjard et al, 2019), and M . giganteus (Dodt et al, 2016) (GenBank Accession no.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…robustus (Janke et al, 1997), M . fuliginosus (Ranjard et al, 2019), and M . giganteus (Dodt et al, 2016) (GenBank Accession no.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted 10,000 nonparametric bootstrap (Felsenstein, 1985) (resampled) replicates using NJ method. We also perform phylogenetic analysis on the sequences of mitochondrial control region of these 16 kangaroos with five additional kangaroo species from GenBank, including M. rufus (Nilsson et al, 2018), M. Bernardus (Nilsson et al, 2018), M. robustus (Janke et al, 1997), M. fuliginosus (Ranjard et al, 2019), and M. giganteus (Dodt et al, 2016) (GenBank Accession no. : KY996501, KY996505, Y10524, NC_039717 and NC_027424, respectively).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%