2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.84.155459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective mass and spin susceptibility of dilute two-dimensional holes in GaAs

Abstract: We report effective hole mass (m * ) measurements through analyzing the temperature dependence of Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations in dilute (density p ∼ 7 × 10 10 cm −2 , rs ∼ 6) two-dimensional (2D) hole systems confined to a 20 nm-wide, (311)A GaAs quantum well. The holes in this system occupy two nearly-degenerate spin subbands whose m * we measure to be ∼ 0.2 (in units of the free electron mass). Despite the relatively large rs in our 2D system, the measured m * is in reasonably good agreement with the resu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33,34 For example, a surprisingly small Coulomb enhancement of the g-factor has been reported 33 and puzzling results have also been obtained for the effective masses m ± of the two hole-spin subbands (σ = ±). 34 A mechanism for the small g-factor enhancement was suggested in Ref. 31: if SOI strongly distorts the ground state spin structure, the exchange energy becomes ineffective in promoting full polarization of the hole system.…”
Section: 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…33,34 For example, a surprisingly small Coulomb enhancement of the g-factor has been reported 33 and puzzling results have also been obtained for the effective masses m ± of the two hole-spin subbands (σ = ±). 34 A mechanism for the small g-factor enhancement was suggested in Ref. 31: if SOI strongly distorts the ground state spin structure, the exchange energy becomes ineffective in promoting full polarization of the hole system.…”
Section: 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen in Table I that, while ∆ 0 does not change with r s , the interaction correction ∆ − ∆ 0 grows at lower densities (see Table I). Since experiments on hole systems can reach values as large as r s = 6 − 12, 33,34 it is reasonable to expect significant effects from δv ± in this low-density regime. As a reference, in electron systems, δv changes from ∼ 5% to −30% for r s ∼ 1 to 6.…”
Section: 36mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Size quantization strongly affects the holes' spin-3/2 degree of freedom [1]. This is believed to be the origin of an unusual paramagnetic response observed for quantum-well-confined holes [2][3][4], and the same phenomenon is expected to stabilize out-of-plane easy-axis magnetism in a dilute-magnetic-semiconductor (DMS) [5][6][7] two-dimensional (2D) hole system [8,9]. Controlling the confinement of holes thus enables appealing routes toward realizing magnetic semiconducting devices based on strain-induced anisotropies [10] or wavefunction engineering in heterostructures [11,12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for a better understanding of this problem is highlighted by recent experiments on dilute hole liquids, in which strong correlations and spin-orbit coupling effects coexist. In this regime, these hole liquids show a significant deviation from the conventional behavior of two-dimensional electron liquids [25,26].…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a given travel time τ , the total travel distance and the separation between the two spin components are larger than the non-interacting value (∆ > δ). The difference in Fermi velocity of the two spin branches could be experimentally probed with transport measurements of the effective mass [112,26] and Raman scattering experiments [113], as well as by direct optical imaging of the wave-packet separation. In fact, for a travel distance of order ∼ µm, the travel time is 1 − 50 ps (depending on density) and typical values of γ for holes give spatial separations between the two spin components of a few hundred nm (∼ 200 nm for g = 0.1 and n = 3), which is within reach of Faraday rotation measurements [114,115].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%