2009
DOI: 10.1039/b815114h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective mixing of laminar flows at a density interface by an integrated ultrasonic transducer

Abstract: An acoustic mixer for glass channel microfluidic systems is presented. An acoustic standing wave, perpendicular to the fluid flow, is generated by the excitation of a miniaturized piezoelectric transducer operated around 10 MHz. The transducer is fabricated into a planar printed circuit board structure, constituting the bottom channel wall, which makes the mixer simple to integrate with a wide selection of microfluidic channel designs. The mixing occurs at a fluid-fluid density interface due to the acoustic ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was reported in literature that acoustic radiation forces may cause mixing at the interface of fluids with different acoustic impedances. 43,44 In our case however, the difference of acoustic impedances of the fluids flowing from the center and the side inlet is less than 0.13%, which points out that mixing is not likely due to acoustic mixing but rather due to the diffusion of the ions inside the channel in the wash unit. Moreover, carried high conductivity fluid (i.e., low resistance) by the particles into the low-conductivity stream (i.e., high resistance) also contributes to the deviation of the result from the ideal case.…”
Section: Experimentation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It was reported in literature that acoustic radiation forces may cause mixing at the interface of fluids with different acoustic impedances. 43,44 In our case however, the difference of acoustic impedances of the fluids flowing from the center and the side inlet is less than 0.13%, which points out that mixing is not likely due to acoustic mixing but rather due to the diffusion of the ions inside the channel in the wash unit. Moreover, carried high conductivity fluid (i.e., low resistance) by the particles into the low-conductivity stream (i.e., high resistance) also contributes to the deviation of the result from the ideal case.…”
Section: Experimentation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…32 Particles present in any of the fluids adjacent to the density interface will move with the flow motion. A density difference in the range of a few percent (> 2 %) is required between the shuffle flow and the sample flow to generate effective fluid motion sufficient for cell sorting purposes.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A density difference in the range of a few percent (> 2 %) is required between the shuffle flow and the sample flow to generate effective fluid motion sufficient for cell sorting purposes. The primary acoustic radiation force acting on a fluid interface, 36 ( )…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple electromagnetically actuated micromixer was presented by Wen et al (2009) with mixing times in the 1 s range. Designs utilizing acoustic waves achieved mixing times down to 7 ms (Ahmed et al 2009;Johansson et al 2009). Another active mixing principle with an actuated cantilever in the mixing channel was investigated by Williams et al (2009) without stating actual mixing times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%