2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.progsurf.2007.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective work functions for ionic and electronic emissions from mono- and polycrystalline surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
61
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 1,053 publications
7
61
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1, the He level was set to −17.5 eV w.r.t. to E F , which corresponds to a constant upward shift by 2 eV (assuming a work function for Au of 5.1 eV, in good agreement with experimental values 50 ). In comparison, calculations with the He 1s level at −21.0 eV w.r.t.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, the He level was set to −17.5 eV w.r.t. to E F , which corresponds to a constant upward shift by 2 eV (assuming a work function for Au of 5.1 eV, in good agreement with experimental values 50 ). In comparison, calculations with the He 1s level at −21.0 eV w.r.t.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As a first step, the ion fractions were determined based on calculations of with a constant upward level shift by 2 eV. Depending on the work functions of the particular surfaces [(110) and (100): 4.6 eV, poly: 5.1 eV 50,51 ], the 2 eV shift corresponds to a He level at 18.0 eV or 17.5 eV below E F , respectively. Similarly as for Au, only qualitative agreement between theory and calculations was achieved: The relative differences between the different crystal faces are reproduced correctly, but calculated AN rates would have to be increased by more than 30% in order to achieve quantitative agreement with experimental data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature coefficient is α = −4.58 · 10 −4 eV/K in the experiment temperature range 300-780 K. measurements that α for pure silver (99.99%) is equal to −5.315k, where k = 8.617 × 10 −5 eV · K −1 , in good agreement with the general rule that α for pure metals is generally less than ± a few Boltzmann constants [21]. In addition, this is approximately in accord with the experimental results on silver [22], approximately ten times larger than the theoretical calculations made by DURAKIEWICZ [23] and somewhat lower than the theoretical predictions of Crowell et al [24], and Kiejna [25].…”
Section: A Effect Of Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The (310) orientation of tungsten has the lowest work function of the prominent low-index planes [25]. Therefore, the majority of electrons is emitted in the forward direction into a single cone with 20 opening angle (FWHM), which is why we chose W(310).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%