2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness evaluation methodology for safety processes to enhance organisational culture in hazardous installations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Industrial countries initially attempted to address the issue through the introduction of health and safety regulations. But catastrophic accidents such as Bhopal (India), Chernobyl (Ukraine), and Piper Alpha (UK) resulted in a view of OHS that was more focused on technical and human factors [1], [5]. Since then, a number of OHS management systems (OHSMSs) have been introduced by national and international bodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Industrial countries initially attempted to address the issue through the introduction of health and safety regulations. But catastrophic accidents such as Bhopal (India), Chernobyl (Ukraine), and Piper Alpha (UK) resulted in a view of OHS that was more focused on technical and human factors [1], [5]. Since then, a number of OHS management systems (OHSMSs) have been introduced by national and international bodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, traditionally safety performance has been measured by metrics such as OSHA recordable injury rates, Days Away, Restrictions and Transfers (DART) injury rates, and Experience Modification Ratio (EMR) that are gathered after losses have been incurred and cost assessments have been made. Such measurements are classified as lagging indicators, whose value remains questionable as they record data of incidents after facts (Hinze, Thurman, & Wehle, 2013) and fail to provide enough information for future safety performance in the workplace (Mengolini, & Debarberis, 2008). As an alternative, leading indicators are measures used to predict future levels of safety performance (Hinze, 2005), through monitoring current information about conditions, processes, and activities that can drive identification, elimination, or control of risks in the workplace (Hallowell, Hinze, Baud, & Wehle, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growing number of safety professionals questions the value of lagging indicators and argue that lagging indicators do not provide enough information or insight to effectively avoid future accidents (e.g. Grabowski et al, 2007;Mengolinim and Debarberis, 2008;Hinze et al, 2013). Hinze et al (2013) concludes that any firm that truly embraces the zero injury philosophy will consider the use of other measures than the traditional lagging indicators of safety performance.…”
Section: Hs Performance and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%