2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2001.00117.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of a protocol to improve transfusion practice in knee replacement surgery

Abstract: A transfusion algorithm, together with staff education, is effective in reducing both the number of patients transfused and inappropriate transfusions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous studies, we found that USB return did not modify either the acute phase response or the cellular immune response to TKR [15,16], but it decreased the risk of receiving an ABT (48% vs. 11%, P < 0·01) and reduced the ABT index by 1 unit [9]. However, a transfusion protocol was not established, probably leading to unnecessary transfusions [17], as ABT rate in the control group was higher than that reported in recent TKR series [1,8,18,19]. In this present study, the introduction of a transfusion protocol (transfusion trigger, Hb < 9 g/dl) resulted in a reduction of ABT rate in patients managed without USB return with respect to our previous series (48% vs. 30·6%; relative risk (RR): 0·60, P < 0·01).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a previous studies, we found that USB return did not modify either the acute phase response or the cellular immune response to TKR [15,16], but it decreased the risk of receiving an ABT (48% vs. 11%, P < 0·01) and reduced the ABT index by 1 unit [9]. However, a transfusion protocol was not established, probably leading to unnecessary transfusions [17], as ABT rate in the control group was higher than that reported in recent TKR series [1,8,18,19]. In this present study, the introduction of a transfusion protocol (transfusion trigger, Hb < 9 g/dl) resulted in a reduction of ABT rate in patients managed without USB return with respect to our previous series (48% vs. 30·6%; relative risk (RR): 0·60, P < 0·01).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…G, general anaesthesia; R, regional anaesthesia. in recent TKR series [1,8,18,19]. In this present study, the introduction of a transfusion protocol (transfusion trigger, Hb < 9 g/dl) resulted in a reduction of ABT rate in patients managed without USB return with respect to our previous series (48% vs. 30·6%; relative risk (RR): 0·60, P < 0·01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…4. We fully agree with Sargant et al and with the authors of many studies [8][9][10][11][12] and guidelines [7] that a protocol for surgical blood loss management with clear objectives can help the team to focus on specific tasks and can facilitate a rapid response. Such a protocol should incorporate predefined triggers and targets to guide individualized hemostatic interventions.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…Additional benefit could be accrued if, when a restrictive policy is in place, ‘group and save’ protocols were in place, rather than having crossmatched blood available, regardless of need. This may itself decrease the possibility of transfusion [43]. The potential savings of implementing a restrictive transfusion policy are impressive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%