Background Capivasertib (AZD5363) is a potent selective oral inhibitor of all three isoforms of the serine/threonine kinase AKT. The FAKTION trial investigated whether the addition of capivasertib to fulvestrant improved progressionfree survival in patients with aromatase inhibitor-resistant advanced breast cancer.Methods In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, postmenopausal women aged at least 18 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, metastatic or locally advanced inoperable breast cancer who had relapsed or progressed on an aromatase inhibitor were recruited from 19 hospitals in the UK. Enrolled participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intramuscular fulvestrant 500 mg (day 1) every 28 days (plus a loading dose on day 15 of cycle 1) with either capivasertib 400 mg or matching placebo, orally twice daily on an intermittent weekly schedule of 4 days on and 3 days off (starting on cycle 1 day 15) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, loss to follow-up, or withdrawal of consent. Treatment allocation was done using an interactive web-response system using a minimisation method (with a 20% random element) and the following minimisation factors: measurable or non-measurable disease, primary or secondary aromatase inhibitor resistance, PIK3CA status, and PTEN status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival with a one-sided alpha of 0•20. Analyses were done by intention to treat. Recruitment is complete, and the trial is in follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01992952.

No abstract

SummaryAlthough haematology analysers provide reliable full blood counts, they are known to be inaccurate at enumerating platelets in severe thrombocytopenia. If the thresholds for platelet transfusion, currently set at 10 · 10 9 /l, are to be further reduced, it is vital that the limitations of current analysers are fully understood. The aim of this large multicentre study was to determine the accuracy of haematology analysers in current routine practice for platelet counts below 20 · 10 9 /l. Platelet counts estimated by analysers using optical, impedance and immunological methods were compared with the International Reference Method for platelet counting. The results demonstrated variation in platelet counting between different analysers and even the same type of analyser at different sites. Optical methods for platelet counting on the XE 2100, Advia 120, Cell-Dyn 4000 and H3* were not superior to impedance methods on the XE 2100, LH750 and Pentra analysers. All analysers except one overestimated the platelet count, which would result in under transfusion of platelets. This study highlights the inaccuracies of haematology analysers in platelet counting in severe thrombocytopenia. It re-emphasizes the need for external quality control to improve analyser calibration for samples with low platelet counts, and suggests that the optimal thresholds for prophylactic platelet transfusions should be re-evaluated.

A barcode patient identification system was found to simplify the clinical transfusion process and improve practice. These results provide support for further work on the development of such systems for transfusion and for other hospital procedures requiring patient identification.