2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of an electro-tactile vestibular substitution system in improving upright postural control in unilateral vestibular-defective patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We allowed individual adjustment rather than setting a fixed amplitude across all subjects, because of known inter-subject differences in tongue sensitivity, with the rationale that it is more important to hold invariant the result of the stimulation rather than its physical level [54]. From our previous research, we have observed that with experience, subjects set the intensity level at between 50 and 80% of the maximum dynamic range of sensation [43-48,50-52]. If subjects could not feel it, they were reassured that they were still receiving stimulation but it was below their individual threshold of perception.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We allowed individual adjustment rather than setting a fixed amplitude across all subjects, because of known inter-subject differences in tongue sensitivity, with the rationale that it is more important to hold invariant the result of the stimulation rather than its physical level [54]. From our previous research, we have observed that with experience, subjects set the intensity level at between 50 and 80% of the maximum dynamic range of sensation [43-48,50-52]. If subjects could not feel it, they were reassured that they were still receiving stimulation but it was below their individual threshold of perception.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This route to the brain was originally used for sensory substitution in both balance-impaired and blind individuals (Chebat et al, 2007; Danilov et al, 2006; Robinson et al, 2009; Tyler, Danilov, Bach-Y-Rita 2003; Vuillerme et al, 2008; Vuillerme and Cuisinier 2009). Cross-modal recruitment theories of plasticity can explain why individuals using the tongue stimulation for sensory substitution show improvement in behavioral tasks (Collignon et al, 2009; Pietrini, Ptito, Kupers 2009; Poirier, De Volder, Scheiber 2007; Ptito et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fatigue condition was executed 5 min after the No fatigue condition. recently observed in sensory conditions of absent visual information [15], altered foot and ankle somatosensory information [6,16], and degraded vestibular and neck proprioceptive information [17,18]. Finally, even though the present study has been conducted in young healthy individuals, we believe that the present findings could have significant implications in the fields of orthopaedics and rehabilitation, for increasing/restoring the ability to sense force at the ankle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%