2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2009.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of antigraffiti treatments in connection with penetration depth determined by different techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, in examining the distribution maps (Figure 4c), high contents in C were not found where Ca was detected. The anti-graffiti product mainly remained on the surface in spite of the high porosity of the substrate, which usually enhances the penetration of both the protective product and the paint [28,32]. However, it is worth mentioning that, in some points, the brighter components, due to the Bi in the paint, were found also below the surface ( Figure 4b).…”
Section: Distribution Of the Paintmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, in examining the distribution maps (Figure 4c), high contents in C were not found where Ca was detected. The anti-graffiti product mainly remained on the surface in spite of the high porosity of the substrate, which usually enhances the penetration of both the protective product and the paint [28,32]. However, it is worth mentioning that, in some points, the brighter components, due to the Bi in the paint, were found also below the surface ( Figure 4b).…”
Section: Distribution Of the Paintmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The unsuccessful result, already clear to the visual inspection by the naked eye (Figure 7i-l), left the ∆E* ab values very high. Although the non-impregnating anti-graffiti products usually show a better efficacy [26], in the samples treated with AG1, the presence of the applied product only on the surface did not guarantee satisfactory results, as already found in other highly porous materials [28]. The paint was the only component in the most external layer, while the chemical remover was likely formulated to affect just the protective coating.…”
Section: Efficacy Of the Removal Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With wax (S), the contact angle measurements hardly reached 90 • (Table 2). In the literature, it has also been reported [3,4] that permanent anti-graffiti coatings are more hydrophobic than wax-based sacrificial products.…”
Section: Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neto et al [3] revealed that a permanent protective coating (fluorinated polymer), which is able to withstand more than one graffiti cleaning cycle, was more effective than a sacrificial coating made of wax. Sacrificial Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%