Effectiveness of calcaneal osteotomy in surgical treatment of foot conditions: A Prisma statement guidelines compliant systematic review

Abstract

Calcaneal osteotomy is a commonly established method used to correct various foot malalignment surgery problems that produce varus and valgus hindfoot abnormality as well as Haglund's deformity, cavovarus foot reconstruction, flatfoot deformity, plantar fasciitis, posterior tibial tendon insufficiency and planovalgus foot. After decades, several procedures in orthopaedic foot surgery have been suggested for reducing the risk of wound and neurovascular complications. The goal of this Prisma statement guidelines compliant systematic review was to establish the effectiveness and safety of calcaneal osteotomy in foot surgery. We have performed a novel

A Novel Technique of Medial Displacement Calcaneal Osteotomy Using the Intramedullary Fixation of a Conventional Low-Profile Locking Wedge Plate

“…The optimal fixation method and material during MDCO remain a subject of debate. In a comprehensive systematic review, López-López et al 20 have highlighted the need for additional studies to establish a consensus on the most suitable fixation methods and optimal incision lengths for calcaneal osteotomy. Furthermore, numerous studies have been carried out on incision method and osteotomy safe zone to prevent sural nerve injury, 24.32 and various devices, including headless screws, or step plates, 17 have also been introduced to reduce patients' discomfort with sufficient stability.…”

How can we build human resources (HR) that deliver value? A systematic literature review of traditional and transformational HR roles

“…The author conducted a systematic literature review based on preferred SPAR‐4‐SLR and PRISMA protocols. The SPAR‐4‐SLR protocol provides reasonable suggestions that help scholars clarify the reasons behind review decisions (Bolt et al., 2022; Lim et al., 2022; López‐López et al., 2022; Onkila & Sarna, 2021; Paul et al., 2021; Ruggiano & Perry, 2017).…”

“…The full paper was analyzed when the relevance of a study was unclear. The author analyzed the titles, abstracts, contents of the articles, and books against inclusion and exclusion criteria (Onkila & Sarna, 2021; Paul et al., 2021; Prus et, al., 2017; López‐López et al., 2022). In the fifth row, after the full‐text screening phase, the author included a total of 41 articles for a systematic review of this paper.…”