2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/721260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of Geoelectrical Resistivity Surveys for the Detection of a Debris Flow Causative Water Conducting Zone at KM 9, Gap-Fraser’s Hill Road (FT 148), Fraser’s Hill, Pahang, Malaysia

Abstract: This study reports the findings of resistivity surveys which were conducted at the initiation area of debris flow at KM 9, Fraser’s Hill Gap road (FT148). The study involves three slope parallel survey lines and two lines perpendicular to the slope face. The parallel lines are FH01, FH02, and FH03, while the lines FH04 and FH05 are perpendicular. A granite body was detected at the central part of the east line and is nearest to the ground surface along FH02. The existence of low resistivity zones within the gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The inverted ERT models were interpreted on the scale of resistivity values that were classified into zones as shown in Table 6. The table shows both weathered and unweathered basement and its spatial distribution of resistivity values into saturated zones with resistivity values ranging from 1 to 600 Ωm, weak zones with resistivity values ranging from 600 to 3,000 Ωm, and basement rock of resistivity value > 5,000 Ωm (Palacky, 1987;Reynolds, 1997;Ghazali et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussion Electrical Resistivity Tomography Models Interprementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inverted ERT models were interpreted on the scale of resistivity values that were classified into zones as shown in Table 6. The table shows both weathered and unweathered basement and its spatial distribution of resistivity values into saturated zones with resistivity values ranging from 1 to 600 Ωm, weak zones with resistivity values ranging from 600 to 3,000 Ωm, and basement rock of resistivity value > 5,000 Ωm (Palacky, 1987;Reynolds, 1997;Ghazali et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussion Electrical Resistivity Tomography Models Interprementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These properties are similar to cohesive materials of high proportion of fine-grained particles because electrical resistivity has the advantage of detecting clay content (cohesive soil) as a very low-resistivity zones (Suzuki et al, 2000), which are usually unstable weak zones of failure. Saturated zones ( Figures 9A,B) occurring in the 0-5 m depth will slide downslope when fully saturated during prolong heavy rainfall because the soil water will cause the soil to lose its cohesion which will induce movement (Carrazza et al, 2016;Ghazali et al, 2013). However, the lowest percentage of 11.4% was also obtained for soil sample collected at 41 m in Figure 9F with the highest estimated density and hydraulic conductivity obtained as 1,458 kg/m3 and 1.34 × 10 −2 m/s, respectively, with the lowest percentage of 5% silt and clay.…”
Section: Geotechnical Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McCarter (1984) showed that at low water contents, the resistivity rapidly decreases with increased water content. (Ghazali et al, 2013) stated that high-water content and weak zones can be determined as low resistivity regions by the methods used in this study. The report by (Ghazali et al, 2013) was also conducted to determine the debris ow in the soil using Geoelectrical Resistivity Surveys.…”
Section: Slope Properties and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Bukit Fraser terletak di batolit granit Banjaran Utama yang didominasi oleh granit biotit (Mohamad Anuri et al 2013). Dua sesar utama, iaitu Sesar Kuala Lumpur dan Sesar Bukit Tinggi, berpotongan dengan rangkaian bukit ini dan terdapat sesar-sesar kecil di dalamnya (Gobbet & Hutchinson 1973).…”
Section: Geologi Am Kawasan Kajianunclassified