Effectiveness of Global, Low-Degree Polynomial Transformations for GCxGC Data Alignment

Abstract

As columns age and differ between systems, retention times for comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GCxGC) may vary between runs. To properly analyze GCxGC chromatograms, it often is desirable to align the retention times of chromatographic features, such as analyte peaks, between chromatograms. Previous work by the authors has shown that global, low-degree polynomial transformation functions, namely affine, second-degree polynomial, and third-degree polynomial, are effective for aligning pairs of two-dimensional chromatograms acquired with dual second columns and detectors (GC×2GC). This work assesses the experimental performance of these global methods on more general GCxGC chromatogram pairs and compares their performance to that of a recent, robust, local alignment algorithm for GCxGC data [ Gros Anal. Chem. 2012 , 84 , 9033 ]. Measuring performance with the root-mean-square (RMS) residual differences in retention times for matched peaks suggests that global, low-degree polynomial transformations outperform the local algorithm given a sufficiently large set of alignment points, and are able to improve misalignment by over 95% based on a lower-bound benchmark of inherent variability. However, with small sets of alignment points, the local method demonstrated lower error rates (although with greater computational overhead). For GCxGC chromatogram pairs with only slight initial misalignment, none of the global or local methods performed well. In some cases with initial misalignment near the inherent variability of the system, these methods worsened alignment, suggesting that it may be better not to perform alignment in such cases.

A step forward in the equivalence between thermal and differential-flow modulated comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography methods

“…Pattern coherence, between mutually translatable methods, enabled effective transfer of metadata from the reference methodology by template matching algorithms [11,12,35].…”

Untargeted/Targeted 2D Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Detection of the Total Volatile Tea Metabolome

“…The software identified compounds when the LRI match was within ± 10 units of published values and the NIST spectral match for that compound was >950. After the analysis, positively matched peaks were used to re-align chromatograms [47,48] and combined into a single, composite chromatogram. 2D-peak detection was performed on the composite chromatogram with peak outlines recorded as peak-region objects in the chromatographic plane.…”

Combined Untargeted and Targeted Fingerprinting by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography to Track Compositional Changes on Hazelnut Primary Metabolome during Roasting

“…In this study, chromatographic fingerprinting was applied by comprehensively extracting peak features information (i.e., summed data for each component peak with associated metadata) including for untargeted and targeted components. To enable effective crosscomparative analysis, peak features pattern matching across multiple chromatograms was guided by mass spectral similarity with DMF ≥ 800 [23,51] and a second-order-polynomial retention-times transformation [52,53]. For targeted components, the approach explicitly matches corresponding peak-features across chromatograms by the target name.…”