2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90162013000400001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of horizontal air flow fans supporting natural ventilation in a Mediterranean multi-span greenhouse

Abstract: -1 ]; ∆ difference; θ wind direction [º]; σ standard deviation; η T ventilation efficiency for the temperature; i inside or interior surface of the vent; j measurement point; L leeward; M average value; o outside; ov air going out through the vents; R roof vent; s sonic; sc sonic corrected; S side vent; W windward; x longitudinal component; y transversal component; z vertical component; c corrected; n normalized; ' fluctuating component.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data also reveals that the drying time on each different kind of garments varies and are increasing. [12] Exposed that using fans inside the greenhouse helps the air to circulate and mix, giving rise to a more homogeneous inside temperature that increased the average value of normalized air velocity by 365 % and increased the average values of kinetic turbulence energy inside the greenhouse by 550 % compared to conditions of natural ventilation. The open and semi-open heat pump dryers could be greatly affected by ambient temperature and humidity while the closed heat pump drying system could be greatly affected by the bypass air rate [13].…”
Section: Observed Moisture Content For S-2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data also reveals that the drying time on each different kind of garments varies and are increasing. [12] Exposed that using fans inside the greenhouse helps the air to circulate and mix, giving rise to a more homogeneous inside temperature that increased the average value of normalized air velocity by 365 % and increased the average values of kinetic turbulence energy inside the greenhouse by 550 % compared to conditions of natural ventilation. The open and semi-open heat pump dryers could be greatly affected by ambient temperature and humidity while the closed heat pump drying system could be greatly affected by the bypass air rate [13].…”
Section: Observed Moisture Content For S-2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By adding the roof vent openings to the exhaust fans (MV2-NV), there was an increase in the difference in air temperature. The associated use of mechanical ventilation would not always imply less variation between the indoor and outdoor environments (López et al, 2013). The authors showed in a Mediterranean greenhouse that with fans placed at 4 m from the side vents, the entrance of outside air was insufficient to reduce the inside temperature on hot days with little wind.…”
Section: Differences Between Indoor and Outdoor Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies evaluated the horizontal distribution in environments with mechanical ventilation systems (Balendonck et al, 2014), natural ventilation (Ferentinos et al, 2017;García-Ruiz et al, 2018) and natural ventilation associated with mechanical ventilation (Kittas et al, 2012;López et al, 2013). As to the vertical distribution, other studies also evaluated greenhouse microclimates with different systems, such as natural ventilation (Suay et al, 2008), or mechanical ventilation and evaporative cooling (Kutta and Hubbart, 2014;Zorzeto and Leal, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%