2016
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2016.020875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of Interventions to Address Visual and Visual–Perceptual Impairments to Improve Occupational Performance in Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Although the strength of the research varied, implications are discussed for practice, education, and research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…D2 activities can be used in conjunction with occupations for improved vision and visual activities. Evidence supports the effectiveness of visual scanning retraining for an impaired visual field, audiovisual stimulation, and the application of a cognitive retraining approach (Berger et al, 2016). This study provides occupational therapy practitioners with normative data they can use to compare patients' physical response speed to age-and sex-matched healthy adults.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…D2 activities can be used in conjunction with occupations for improved vision and visual activities. Evidence supports the effectiveness of visual scanning retraining for an impaired visual field, audiovisual stimulation, and the application of a cognitive retraining approach (Berger et al, 2016). This study provides occupational therapy practitioners with normative data they can use to compare patients' physical response speed to age-and sex-matched healthy adults.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Befitting such a complex condition, the questions for the systematic reviews are wide ranging. They include examination of interventions to improve arousal and alertness after TBI (Padilla & Domina, 2016) and to treat visual and visualperceptual (Berger, Kaldenberg, Selmane, & Carlo, 2016); motor (Chang, Baxter, & Rissky, 2016); cognitive (Radomski, Anheluk, Bartzen, & Zola, 2016); and psychosocial, behavioral, or emotional (Wheeler, Acord-Vira, & Davis, 2016) dysfunction. Some of the primary outcomes of interest are specific to improvement in the impairment being treated, whereas others examine the effect of the intervention on occupational performance and participation.…”
Section: Contents Of the Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One challenge is the need to address multiple interrelated impairments simultaneously, making it difficult to examine the effect of a single intervention on a single impairment (Berger et al, 2016;Chang et al, 2016). Another is the difficulty that the typical interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary nature of TBI rehabilitation brings to investigating the specific contribution of occupational therapy services (Powell et al, 2016;Wheeler et al, 2016).…”
Section: Contents Of the Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although interruptions in the visual pathway are common following brain injury, occupational therapists (OTs) often feel unprepared or under-resourced when addressing these concerns [ 13 ], and even fewer feel prepared to specifically address oculomotor impairment [ 14 ••]. This is exacerbated by the lack of robust research and guidelines for treating these impairments [ 12 • , 15 , 16 ]. We hope to provide clinicians with improved tools for understanding their role in identifying and addressing oculomotor impairment following TBI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%