2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
233
3
21

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 342 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(75 reference statements)
16
233
3
21
Order By: Relevance
“…This sensitivity towards the task properties and ones own cognitive system is the product of several learning experiences that are metacognitively monitored and evaluated. Many trainings on learning strategies address these issues and foster metacognitive awareness especially of young learners (see the meta-analysis of Donker et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sensitivity towards the task properties and ones own cognitive system is the product of several learning experiences that are metacognitively monitored and evaluated. Many trainings on learning strategies address these issues and foster metacognitive awareness especially of young learners (see the meta-analysis of Donker et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that to improve writing, it is beneficial to train writing strategies and to support the writing process through feedback (Graham, 2006;Nelson and Schunn, 2009;Donker et al, 2014). This is also true for higher education (Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick, 2006;MacArthur , 2015;Wischgoll, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diversity in results of meta-analyses makes it difficult to draw overall conclusions, but the norm in school effectiveness studies is small effect sizes, below the benchmark of d = .20, which is seen as indicative of "educational significance". Meta-analyses on effective teaching strategies tend to show higher effect sizes than school effectiveness studies (e.g., De Boer, Donker, De Boer, Kostons, Dignath-Van Ewijk, & Van der Werf, 2014;Hattie, Biggs, & Purdie, 1996), in the order of d = .40 to .80. At the same time, there are also meta-analyses on teaching factors that show very small effect sizes (Creemers & Kyriakides, 2008;Scheerens, 2007;Seidel & Shavelson, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%