Measuring grip strength is considered an important measurement, not only for athletes but also for various parts of society, including inactive people. It is also considered a general indicator in various health matters, such as sarcopenia and heart disease in the elderly, while also aiding in identifying strengths and weaknesses in young individuals, and given the rapid advancement of technology, increased sedentary lifestyles, and a rise in health issues, including premature mortality, and given the lack of standardized grip strength data related to health in Palestine and considering the researcher's 23-year teaching experience at the College of Sports Sciences at Palestine Technical University, Kadoorie, and a review of the relevant literature, it was found that there is a disparity in the literature concerning the optimal approach to measuring maximum grip strength. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of different testing postures on maximum hand grip strength among healthy male students at Palestine Technical University, Kadoorie/Ramallah Branch. A total of 97 male participants aged 20-22 years were included as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Grip strength was measured by handheld dynamometer in six positions: 1) standing with a 90-degree elbow flexion; 2) sitting with a 90-degree elbow flexion; 3) standing with full elbow extension; 4) sitting with full elbow extension; 5) standing with full elbow extension to the front; and 6) sitting with full elbow extension to the front. The following anthropometric measurements were made: height, weight, and wrist circumference. The grip strength value in the sitting position with the elbow flexed 90° was significantly greater than those in other positions. In addition, the results revealed a statistically significant positive correlation between grip strength and weight (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.381), height (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.337), wrist circumference (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.299), and body mass index (BMI) (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.268). Additionally, 8.2% of the students had strong grip strength, 13.4% had weak grip strength, and 78.4% exhibited normal grip strength. Understanding the correct measurement of grip strength and assessing a student's' grip strength level compared to global standards assists university officials and governments in developing necessary plans to enhance health proficiency