Effectiveness of monetary discounts: comparing quantity scarcity and time restriction

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine whether adding a quantity scarcity message to a monetary discount helps to improve consumers’ offer-related perceptions and intentions, and how the effectiveness of that message compares with adding time restriction to the offer. Design/methodology/approach Two experiments, where participants evaluated retail ads and responded to relevant measures, were conducted in two country markets. Findings Adding either a quantity scarcity message or time restriction to a monetary discount increases the potency of a retail offer. Further, when an offer ad emphasizes product and price-related cues in a balanced manner, time restriction results in more favorable consumer perceptions than scarcity. However, this difference in the messages’ efficacy disappears when the offer strongly emphasizes price-related cues. Research limitations/implications The US market sample is more homogeneous than the Indian one. Discounts were presented in terms of advertised reference prices; further research with other discount formats is desirable. Practical implications Understanding the relative efficacy of quantity scarcity message and time restriction in discounted retail offers can give managers flexibility in the use of these tools. Originality/value This paper addresses scholars’ call for theory-grounded research that provides guidance to retailers on the use of sales promotional tools.

Effectiveness of Travel Social Media Influencers: A Case of Eco-Friendly Hotels

“…Second, it provides a conceptual framework for conducting a thorough assessment of the input communication and output persuasion factors in persuading consumers. Third, despite its limited application in tourism and hospitality, the matrix has been widely used in advertising and communication research (Jha, Dutta, and Koksal 2019; Zhou et al 2021), as it allows for in-depth examination of the communication–persuasion process and is especially useful in determining the effectiveness of the message, source, content, design, and diffusion channel (Muturi 2016).…”

Advertising with scarcity messages and attitudes for luxury skin-care products

“…Non-conspicuous goods had greater attitudes (Gierl and Huettl, 2010) and utilitarian products (Ku et al, 2011) had greater purchase intentions for the high-demand group as compared to the limited-supply group. Non-conspicuous goods had greater purchase intentions for the limited-time group as compared to the limited-supply group (Jha et al, 2019). Both time restriction and countdown timer had greater attitudes and greater purchase intentions than no time restriction (Kim et al, 2020).…”

“…In a study of tablet computer advertisements and purchase intention, a limited-time message had a greater mean value than a limited-quantity message and the control group of no specific time or scarcity message had the lowest mean for purchase intention (Jha et al. , 2019).…”

“…, 2011) had greater purchase intentions for the high-demand group as compared to the limited-supply group. Non-conspicuous goods had greater purchase intentions for the limited-time group as compared to the limited-supply group (Jha et al. , 2019).…”

Outlet selectivity: how and when does it work?

“…Aggarwal and Vaidyanathan, 2003;Devlin et al, 2007), comparing shoppers' responses to quantity scarcity and time restriction (e.g. Aggarwal et al, 2011;Jang et al, 2015;Jha et al, 2019;Mitomi, 2018). Though research has shown that individuals do use limited availability as a cue in evaluating offers (Gierl and Huettl, 2010;Inman et al, 1997), the particular strategy of restricting offers to specified outlets has not yet attracted significant interest in the literature.…”