Effectiveness of preoperative group education for patients with colorectal cancer: managing expectations

Koet, Lesley Larissa; Kraima, Anne C.; Derksen, Ilona; Lamme, Bas; Belt, Eric Jacobus Theodorus; Rosmalen, Joost van; Smeenk, R.M.; Hoeven, Joost A. B. van der

doi:10.1007/s00520-021-06072-5

Cited by 16 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In a meta-analysis covering patients undergoing cancer surgery, education reduced anxiety and health care costs while simultaneously increasing the knowledge and satisfaction of patients [ 17 ]. A more recent RCT of 73 patients with colorectal cancer, reported improved body image after surgery and enhanced recovery of self-reported global health status and reduced LOS after extra preoperative group education [ 18 ]. However, meta-analyses on education for patients undergoing elective spinal surgery as well as a cluster RCT in patients undergoing visceral surgery did not report any sustained benefit on the majority of clinical outcome [ 19 , 20 ].…”

Section: Results: Evidence Base and Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: A 2021 Update

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background This is the second updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline, presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in bariatric surgery and providing recommendations for each ERAS item within the ERAS® protocol. Methods A principal literature search was performed utilizing the Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases and ClinicalTrials.gov through December 2020, with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials and large prospective cohort studies. Selected studies were examined, reviewed and graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. After critical appraisal of these studies, the group of authors reached consensus regarding recommendations. Results The quality of evidence for many ERAS interventions remains relatively low in a bariatric setting and evidence-based practices may need to be extrapolated from other surgeries. Conclusion A comprehensive, updated evidence-based consensus was reached and is presented in this review by the ERAS® Society.

show abstract

Section: Results: Evidence Base and Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: A 2021 Update

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The benefits of preoperative patient education extend over clinical, psychological and economic domains [ 10 – 12 ]. It decreases patient anxiety, pain and length of hospital stay following surgery [ 12 ], and also leads to more positive self-image [ 11 ]. Preoperative education may also improve engagement by making the patient an active participant in their care [ 13 ], and effectively reduces hospitalization duration in patients at high risk of extended stay [ 10 ].…”

Section: Components Of Erpsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Framework, component, and implementation of enhanced recovery pathways

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The introduction of enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) has led to a considerable paradigm shift towards evidence-based, multidisciplinary perioperative care. Such pathways are now widely implemented in a variety of surgical specialties, with largely positive results. In this narrative review, we summarize the principles, components and implementation of ERPs, focusing on recent developments in the field. We also discuss ‘special cases’ in ERPs, including: surgery in frail patients; emergency procedures; and patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00540-022-03088-x.

show abstract

“…The twelve RCTs were conducted in seven countries: Hong Kong (Ho et al, 2020), China (Li & Liu, 2019;Lin et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2014a;Zhang et al, 2020;Zhou & Sun, 2021), Australia (White et al, 2012), India (Kalpana Raghunath et al, 2020), The Netherlands (Golsteijn et al, 2018;Koet et al, 2021), United Kingdom (Shepherd et al, 2019), Germany (Holger Cramer et al, 2016). All of the studies included 2576 patients who were diagnosed with colorectal cancer in ten articles, except two articles that included only colon cancer (Lin et al, 2020;.…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The age of participants was equal to or above 18 years old in ten out of twelve studies, and two studies conducted on participants at all age of participants (K. Zhang et al, 2020). Based on the Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) system, three of studies included patients who were at stage I to IV (Ho et al, 2020;Koet et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2020), three of them included ones who were at stage II and III (Li & Liu, 2019;Zhang et al, 2014b), three studies collected patients who were at stage I to stage III (H. White et al, 2012;Zhou & Sun, 2021), two studies selected patients who were at stage II to IV (Lin et al, 2020;Shepherd et al, 2019), one study did not mention about stage of disease (Golsteijn et al, 2018).…”

Section: Study Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Four of the studies recruited patients who were undergoing only surgery (H. Koet et al, 2021;Lin et al, 2020;Zhou & Sun, 2021), adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery (Li & Liu, 2019;Shepherd et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2014a), trimodal treatment with surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy (Golsteijn et al, 2018;Ho et al, 2020;White et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2020).…”

Section: Study Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Anxiety Among Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Hạnh¹,

Jitpanya²,

Preechawong³

2022

bic

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Studies reported different non-pharmacological interventions to treat anxiety in colorectal cancer patients, but still their effectiveness is unknown. We aim to evaluate the non-pharmacological interventions used to treat anxiety in colorectal cancer. We performed a systematic review and searched PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Scopus. We selected RCTs published between 2011 and 2021 in the English language. We assessed the quality of articles using JBI Critical appraisal tools for RCTs. Most studies – 8 out of 12 RCTs – showed a significant reduction in anxiety scores after using non-pharmacological interventions. The most popular interventions were education, relaxation, psychological intervention, naturopathy, yoga, dietary, consultation, physical activity, and entertainment activities. The non-pharmacological interventions used in treating anxiety significantly improve anxiety scores in CRC patients after treatment in almost included studies by applying mixed methods of education, relaxation, psychological intervention, naturopathy, yoga, dietary, consultation, physical activity, and entertainment activities.

show abstract

Effectiveness of preoperative group education for patients with colorectal cancer: managing expectations

Cited by 16 publications

References 26 publications

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: A 2021 Update

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: A 2021 Update

Framework, component, and implementation of enhanced recovery pathways

Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Anxiety Among Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About