2004
DOI: 10.1002/ajim.10339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of the HomeSafe Pilot Program in reducing injury rates among residential construction workers, 1994–1998

Abstract: The decline in injury rates following HomeSafe cannot be attributed solely to HomeSafe, however, programmatic and methodologic limitations contributed to the inconclusive results. Further research into the hazards faced by residential construction workers is needed. Am. J. Ind. Med. 45:210-217, 2004.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar studies conducted in other countries have obtained similar results [Spangenberg et al, 2002;Darragh et al, 2004]. However, since injuries are statistically rare events, similar schemes involving a larger number of workers might achieve more significant results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Similar studies conducted in other countries have obtained similar results [Spangenberg et al, 2002;Darragh et al, 2004]. However, since injuries are statistically rare events, similar schemes involving a larger number of workers might achieve more significant results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Two studies used a pre-post design with a control group but were not classified as RCTs due to non-random assignment to conditions (Becker et al, 2001) or comparison with non-matched convenience samples (Mancini et al, 2005). Two studies used a pre-post design with no control group (Forst et al, 2013;Sokas et al, 2009); three studies used an interrupted time-series design with (Laitinen and Päivärinta, 2010) or without a control group (Darragh et al, 2004;Spangenberg et al, 2002); and two studies used a mixed-approach including both pre-post and time-series analyses with (Lopez-Ruiz et al, 2013) or without a control group (Bena et al, 2009). The final study employed a within-groups design where four different behaviours were targeted in a staggered fashion and the same group of participants served as the intervention and control groups (Lingard and Rowlinson, 1997).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of construction work varied, from specific trades (e.g., carpentry, roofing, tiling, concrete, floor laying) to larger scale industries (e.g., metal/steel/aluminium work, stone quarry, railways). Six studies were conducted in the USA (Becker et al, 2001;Darragh et al, 2004;Forst et al, 2013;Kerr et al, 2007;Lusk et al, 1999;Sokas et al, 2009), three in Denmark (Kines et al, 2013(Kines et al, , 2010Spangenberg et al, 2002), two in Italy (Bena et al, 2009;Mancini et al, 2005), and one each in Hong Kong (Lingard and Rowlinson, 1997), India (Adams et al, 2013), Spain (Lopez-Ruiz et al, 2013), and Finland (Laitinen and Päivärinta, 2010).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other factors include the risk differences depending on the categories of building workers involved and the different impacts of intervention policies in the work market. Often, the type and intensity of information and training activity were not documented [8,9,18,30]. Furthermore, some studies included were longitudinal studies monitoring the frequency of injuries in specific groups of workers after risk reduction programmes had been applied.…”
Section: Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%