2011
DOI: 10.1159/000330882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of Theta-Burst Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treating Chronic Tinnitus

Abstract: Objectives: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a noninvasive method for altering cortical excitability, is becoming a therapeutic strategy in auditory research institutions worldwide. Application of inhibiting rTMS on these overactive cortical regions can result in effective tinnitus suppression. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of theta-burst rTMS in patients with chronic tinnitus. Study Design: Parallel randomized control study. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
2
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding may therefore help explain the reported success of some recently developed transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) therapies that target left auditory cortex (Burger et al, 2011; Chung et al, 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Our finding may therefore help explain the reported success of some recently developed transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) therapies that target left auditory cortex (Burger et al, 2011; Chung et al, 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Placing the coil over the left temporal area according to the 10–20 EEG coordinate systems (Langguth et al, 2006b) also resulted in a significant reduction of tinnitus severity after 10 sessions of 1 Hz rTMS. Beneficial effects of low-frequency rTMS have been confirmed by many (Rossi et al, 2007; Smith et al, 2007; Khedr et al, 2008, 2010; Anders et al, 2010; Marcondes et al, 2010; Chung et al, 2011; Mennemeier et al, 2011) but not by all controlled studies (Piccirillo et al, 2011). Unspecific effects can largely be excluded since all mentioned studies controlled for the acoustic artifact by using a sham condition and in two recent studies the control condition even involved additional electrical superficial nerve stimulation (Rossi et al, 2007; Mennemeier et al, 2011).…”
Section: The Involvement Of Central Auditory Pathways In Tinnitusmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition to the abovementioned RCTs on low-frequency rTMS, 2 RCT on theta-burst rTMS have been performed and 2 RCT on high-frequency rTMS. One study finds a significant improvement for theta-burst rTMS compared with placebo [Chung et al, 2012], the other did not find a difference between theta-burst rTMS and placebo [Plewnia et al, 2012]. The 2 RCTs on high-frequency rTMS both found a significant effect [Fregni et al, 2006;Khedr et al, 2008].…”
Section: Bilateral Rtms For Tinnitusmentioning
confidence: 99%