2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a Coordinative Ability Training Program on Adolescents’ Cognitive Functioning

Abstract: The purpose of this randomized controlled study was to investigate the effects of a 12-week coordinative ability training program on adolescents’ cognitive functioning, using evaluation tests of visuospatial perception, attention, and working memory. We randomly assigned 60 public school students (14–15 years) to either an experimental coordinative abilities training (∼40 min twice/week) group (n = 30) or a control group (n = 30) who received general psycho-physical wellness training (∼40 min., twice a week). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(65 reference statements)
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All participants were healthy students with ages ranging from 4 to 15 years. While one study investigated 4-6-year-olds (Boccia et al, 2017), one study 12-13-year-olds (Ben-Zeev et al, 2020) and one study 14-15-year-olds (Latino et al, 2021), the mean age in the remaining studies ranged from 7.6 to 12.0 years. One record contained girls only (Jansen et al, 2011a), two boys only (Boraczyński et al, 2019;Ben-Zeev et al, 2020), one study had a male-female ratio of 19 to one (Pietsch and Jansen, 2018) and one did not give details on the amount of boys and girls participating but performed their intervention in regular school classes (Dirksen et al, 2015).…”
Section: Participants Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…All participants were healthy students with ages ranging from 4 to 15 years. While one study investigated 4-6-year-olds (Boccia et al, 2017), one study 12-13-year-olds (Ben-Zeev et al, 2020) and one study 14-15-year-olds (Latino et al, 2021), the mean age in the remaining studies ranged from 7.6 to 12.0 years. One record contained girls only (Jansen et al, 2011a), two boys only (Boraczyński et al, 2019;Ben-Zeev et al, 2020), one study had a male-female ratio of 19 to one (Pietsch and Jansen, 2018) and one did not give details on the amount of boys and girls participating but performed their intervention in regular school classes (Dirksen et al, 2015).…”
Section: Participants Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of all included studies, three implemented their training with participants engaged in regular sporting activities (i.e., soccer (Pietsch and Jansen, 2018;Boraczyński et al, 2019) or gymnastics (Jansen et al, 2011a)) while all other studies were conducted with regular school classes. Physical exercise programs that were eligible for inclusion comprised sport-specific activities (i.e., juggling, soccer and creative dance training) (Jansen et al, 2011aPietsch and Jansen, 2018), motor-coordinative exercises (i.e., Life Kinetik motion program, coordinative motor training or multi-mode proprioceptive-coordinative training) (Bluechel et al, 2013;Dirksen et al, 2015;Pietsch et al, 2017;Boraczyński et al, 2019;Latino et al, 2021), functional exercises at high intensity (Ben-Zeev et al, 2020), and training programs focusing on orientation and navigation (i.e., orienteering or navigation games) (Notarnicola et al, 2012;Boccia et al, 2017). Training programs were either conducted in a sports club (Jansen et al, 2011a;Boraczyński et al, 2019) or within a school setting (Notarnicola et al, 2012;Bluechel et al, 2013;Dirksen et al, 2015;Boccia et al, 2017;Pietsch et al, 2017;Pietsch and Jansen, 2018;Ben-Zeev et al, 2020;Latino et al, 2021).…”
Section: Intervention Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations