2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-013-1851-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a Destabilization Heat Treatment on the Microstructure and Abrasive Wear Behavior of High-Chromium White Cast Iron Investigated Using Different Characterization Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,11 An optimal destabilization process is highly dependent on the temperature (900-1150°C) and holding time (5 min to 8 h), and thus, the used parameters together with the chemical composition (especially the Cr/C ratio) will determine the type of SC. 9,[12][13][14][15] The parameters used during destabilization also determine the amount of carbon that remains in solution in the austenitic matrix and therefore the amount of retained austenite, its final hardness and subsequent resistance. 14 Destabilization at higher temperatures leads to a reduction in the driving force for carbide precipitation, resulting in a lower Ms temperature, and therefore, a large amount of austenite will be retained within the martensitic matrix, with lower overall material hardness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 An optimal destabilization process is highly dependent on the temperature (900-1150°C) and holding time (5 min to 8 h), and thus, the used parameters together with the chemical composition (especially the Cr/C ratio) will determine the type of SC. 9,[12][13][14][15] The parameters used during destabilization also determine the amount of carbon that remains in solution in the austenitic matrix and therefore the amount of retained austenite, its final hardness and subsequent resistance. 14 Destabilization at higher temperatures leads to a reduction in the driving force for carbide precipitation, resulting in a lower Ms temperature, and therefore, a large amount of austenite will be retained within the martensitic matrix, with lower overall material hardness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement in the wear resistance of high-Cr cast iron can be achieved when the as-cast austenite matrix was transformed to martensitic matrix by destabilization treatment. 18) The martensitic matrix with precipitation of numerous secondary carbides is often preferred for many wear applications. 17) The microstructures of the alloys exhibiting the matrix and distribution of secondary carbides after destabilizing treatment are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Microstructure After Heat Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the network eutectic carbides are very stable so that they are not easily eliminated by heat treatment [3,8]. Therefore, the microstructure of high-chromium white irons is improved by various heat treatment methods, such as destabilization heat treatment and sub-critical heat treatment [5,[9][10][11][12]. Destabilizing heat treatment with relative low austenitizing temperature is used to cause coarse secondary carbides to precipitate [8], which lowers the alloy content in austenite and leads to the martensitic transformation at room temperatures if cooling is fast enough [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While subcritical heat treatment below the austenitizing temperature is used to reduce the retained austenite and obtain a martensitic matrix by the precipitation of large quantities of fine secondary carbides [11,13]. The retained austenite has a high intrinsic fracture toughness [14] and transformation-induced plasticity (TRIP) by strain-induced martensitic transformation [9,10], such as wear induced martensitic transformation [11]. However, it is easy to cause high phase-transformation stress and cracking during the transformation induced by wear [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%