2002
DOI: 10.1097/00001577-200214010-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a Dynamic Versus a Static Prone Stander on Bone Mineral Density and Behavior in Four Children with Severe Cerebral Palsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A two phase study focused on the effects of a static versus a dynamic (motorized) prone stander on bone mineral density (phase I) and behaviour related to tasks and specific goals (phase II) in four preschool children with severe cerebral palsy (Gudjonsdottir & Stemmons Mercer, ). In phase I, there were increases in bone mineral density in both children who used a dynamic stander and one of two children who used a static stander.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A two phase study focused on the effects of a static versus a dynamic (motorized) prone stander on bone mineral density (phase I) and behaviour related to tasks and specific goals (phase II) in four preschool children with severe cerebral palsy (Gudjonsdottir & Stemmons Mercer, ). In phase I, there were increases in bone mineral density in both children who used a dynamic stander and one of two children who used a static stander.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose to implement the A 1 B 1 A 2 B 2 design, because we judged it appropriate to the context. This research design provides an alternation of phases of control (A 1 and A 2 ), without the use of the standing frame, and phases of intervention (B 1 and B 2 ), with the daily use of the standing frame in the living environment of the child, in accordance with the usual clinical practice (Herman et al, ; Kecskemethy et al, ; Eisenberg et al, ; Gudjonsdottir and Stemmons, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health care professionals share the opinion that the upright position contributes to relieving constipation, so clinicians frequently indicate the standing frame with this clinical purpose. In searching the literature, we found one systematic review (Pin, ) and eight clinical trials dealing with the use of the standing frame in children with CP (Ivey et al, ; Motloch and Brearley, ; Herman et al, ; Kecskemethy et al, ; Eisenberg et al, ; Gibson et al, ; Gudjonsdottir and Stemmons, ; Salem et al, ) (Figure ). However, none of these studies investigated the effectiveness of the standing frame on constipation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…112 Apart from the expected positive effects of standing on bone mineral density and circulation, positioning in a standing table provides an elongated position of the hip and knee flexors. [113][114][115] Benefits are achieved provided that the child is positioned correctly with sufficient attention to the position of the feet, sufficient knee-and hip extension, slight abduction, and external rotation in the hips and adequate pelvic tilt.…”
Section: Positioning In Orthoses and Mobility Aidsmentioning
confidence: 99%