2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a mixture of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis on the performance of growing-finishing pigs

Abstract: The study was conducted to determine the effects of a Bacillus-based probiotic (mixture of spores of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (DSM 25840) and Bacillus subtilis (DSM 32324) supplementation on growth performance and health of growing-finishing (GF) pigs. A total of 576 GF pigs with initial body weight (BW) of 23.2 + 2.95 kg were allotted to one of two treatments (control diet and probiotic diet). Pigs were blocked by litter origin, BW and sex and allotted to 24 mixed-sex pens (6 entire males and 6 females per … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This review outlines two applications for reduction of antibiotic use, including for growth promotion and disease prevention. An overview of possible antibiotic alternatives for growth promotion derived from previous studies is presented in Supplementary Table 1 (Cha et al, 2012;Kim et al, 2014;Yoon et al, 2014;Zeng et al, 2014;Devi et al, 2015;Gois et al, 2016;Hossain et al, 2016;Lee et al, 2016;Peng et al, 2016;Sbardella et al, 2016;Tang et al, 2016;Upadhaya et al, 2016;Wan et al, 2016;Lan et al, 2017;Lei et al, 2017;Ma et al, 2017;Pan et al, 2017;Wu et al, 2017;Huang et al, 2018;Lei et al, 2018;Samolińska et al, 2018;Sayan et al, 2018;Seo et al, 2018;Xu et al, 2018;Pei et al, 2019;San Andres et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2019;Duarte et al, 2020;Petry et al, 2020;Ren et al, 2020;Satessa et al, 2020;van der Peet-Schwering et al, 2020;Wei et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2020;Sun et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2021). These vary considerably from chemical compounds, biologically active substances, and microbially derived products.…”
Section: Alternatives To Antibioticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review outlines two applications for reduction of antibiotic use, including for growth promotion and disease prevention. An overview of possible antibiotic alternatives for growth promotion derived from previous studies is presented in Supplementary Table 1 (Cha et al, 2012;Kim et al, 2014;Yoon et al, 2014;Zeng et al, 2014;Devi et al, 2015;Gois et al, 2016;Hossain et al, 2016;Lee et al, 2016;Peng et al, 2016;Sbardella et al, 2016;Tang et al, 2016;Upadhaya et al, 2016;Wan et al, 2016;Lan et al, 2017;Lei et al, 2017;Ma et al, 2017;Pan et al, 2017;Wu et al, 2017;Huang et al, 2018;Lei et al, 2018;Samolińska et al, 2018;Sayan et al, 2018;Seo et al, 2018;Xu et al, 2018;Pei et al, 2019;San Andres et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2019;Duarte et al, 2020;Petry et al, 2020;Ren et al, 2020;Satessa et al, 2020;van der Peet-Schwering et al, 2020;Wei et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2020;Sun et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2021). These vary considerably from chemical compounds, biologically active substances, and microbially derived products.…”
Section: Alternatives To Antibioticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present studies used several species of Bacillus spp., including B. subtillis , B. licheniformis , B. coagulans , and B. amyloliquefaciens . Giang et al [ 21 ], Patarapreecha et al [ 30 ], and Silva et al [ 31 ] used only B. subtilis , and Fu et al [ 32 ] used B. coagulans , while Rybarczk et al [ 33 ] and Upadhaya et al [ 28 ] used a combination of B. licheniformis and B. subtilis and van der Peet-Schwering et al [ 34 ] used a combination of B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens . Balasubramanian et al [ 27 ] was the only one who used a combination of three bacillus, B. licheniformis , B. subtilis , and B. coagulans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%