2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.671385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a Peer-Tutorial Reading Racetrack on Word Fluency of Secondary Students With Learning Disabilities and Emotional Behavioral Disorders

Abstract: Reading difficulties that are not addressed at the primary level continue to exist at the secondary level with serious consequences. Thus, it is important to provide struggling students with specific reading support. In particular, many students with learning disabilities (LD) and emotional behavioral disorders (EBD) demonstrate reading obstacles and are at risk for motivation loss. A multiple baseline design was used to evaluate the effects of a motivational reading racetrack as peer-tutoring on the word read… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the social validity rating showed broad acceptance of the intervention, which is an important factor, especially considering the ages of the participants and the playful nature of the intervention. Overall, these findings are in line with previous research on combined racetrack studies (Barwasser et al, 2021a;Barwasser et al, 2021b;Barwasser et al, 2021c;Grünke, 2019). Some students already started with higher scores in phase A, which limited the degree of improvement in phase B.…”
Section: Main Findingssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the social validity rating showed broad acceptance of the intervention, which is an important factor, especially considering the ages of the participants and the playful nature of the intervention. Overall, these findings are in line with previous research on combined racetrack studies (Barwasser et al, 2021a;Barwasser et al, 2021b;Barwasser et al, 2021c;Grünke, 2019). Some students already started with higher scores in phase A, which limited the degree of improvement in phase B.…”
Section: Main Findingssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Automatisation of items is an important factor to relieve the working memory (Sullivan et al, 2013). Several studies with RT were able to show improvements in sight word reading for students with and without disabilities in primary and secondary education (Barwasser et al, 2021a; Barwasser et al, 2021b; Barwasser et al, 2021c; Grünke & Barwasser, 2019; Sperling et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Racetracks has shown positive effects on reading fluency in several studies (Barwasser et al, 2021;Erbey et al, 2011;Green et al, 2010;Grünke, 2019;Hopewell et al, 2011;Hyde et al, 2009;Sperling et al, 2019 and it can be used with a wide range of learners (Falk et al, 2003), which makes it useful for students in inclusion settings. However, all respective studies used a one-onone teaching approach, unsuitable for inclusive classroom instruction.…”
Section: A Cooperative Game-based Approach To Integrate Repeated Reading Into Regular Inclusive Classroom Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as it is believed that one of the duties of elementary school teachers is to train students to read fluently, this is primarily done at the lower levels. As a result, secondary reading promotion is frequently disregarded (Barwasser et al 2021). Reading, writing, speaking, and listening are just a few functional skills that are impacted by learning disabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%