2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a perilymphatic fistula on the passive vibration response of the basilar membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fluid structure interaction acoustic analysis of vibrating BM within the cochlea of the inner ear was performed first to confirm the actual travelling wave propagation motion in the ML membrane, as shown in Figure S1 32 . The relationship between an incoming frequency and the position at which a vibrating ML membrane exhibits maximum amplitude was found to be in good agreement with that reported in previous studies performed on the human cochlea 33 . Subsequently, the analysis model was modified for the initial prototype by changing the size and material properties.…”
Section: Fluid-structure Interaction Acoustic Analysissupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The fluid structure interaction acoustic analysis of vibrating BM within the cochlea of the inner ear was performed first to confirm the actual travelling wave propagation motion in the ML membrane, as shown in Figure S1 32 . The relationship between an incoming frequency and the position at which a vibrating ML membrane exhibits maximum amplitude was found to be in good agreement with that reported in previous studies performed on the human cochlea 33 . Subsequently, the analysis model was modified for the initial prototype by changing the size and material properties.…”
Section: Fluid-structure Interaction Acoustic Analysissupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The radius r of the cochlea and the angle θ between the RM and BM were 0.5 mm and 15 degrees, respectively. The density, bulk modulus, and viscosity of the fluid were 1.034×10 3 kg/m 3 [7], 2.2×10 9 Pa [2], and 2.8×10 -3 Pa•s [7], respectively. Further, the density and Poisson's ratio of the RM and BM were respectively 1.2×10 3 kg/m 3 [7] and 0.49 [7]; and Young's modulus of the RM was 15 MPa [8].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density, bulk modulus, and viscosity of the fluid were 1.034×10 3 kg/m 3 [7], 2.2×10 9 Pa [2], and 2.8×10 -3 Pa•s [7], respectively. Further, the density and Poisson's ratio of the RM and BM were respectively 1.2×10 3 kg/m 3 [7] and 0.49 [7]; and Young's modulus of the RM was 15 MPa [8]. FEM with 10,664 elements was applied for the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length d between RM and BM was used as a parameter, and we studied the influence of d on the dispersion relations of the cochlea. The density and bulk modulus of the ideal fluid were respectively 1.034×10 3 kg/m 3 [18] and 2.2×10 9 Pa [1]; the density and Poisson's ratio of RM and BM were respectively 1.2×10 3 kg/m 3 [18] and 0.49 [18]; and Young's modulus of RM was 15 MPa [19]. We used COMSOL Multiphysics with 662 nodes and 8838 elements.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%