2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00431-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a photic input on the human cortico-motoneuron connection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, it cannot explain the reversal of the direction of hand-centered modulation when subjects could not confidently prepare a response in advance. Second, the time course of startle-related inhibition based on TMS studies (Cantello et al, 2000) just precedes the corticospinal modulations reported here, which are restricted to 70 -80 ms after distractor ball appearance. Furthermore, Cantello et al (2000) did not provide (or search for) evidence for any hand-centered mechanisms, so any direct links with our results remain speculative.…”
Section: Threat-induced Freezingsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…First, it cannot explain the reversal of the direction of hand-centered modulation when subjects could not confidently prepare a response in advance. Second, the time course of startle-related inhibition based on TMS studies (Cantello et al, 2000) just precedes the corticospinal modulations reported here, which are restricted to 70 -80 ms after distractor ball appearance. Furthermore, Cantello et al (2000) did not provide (or search for) evidence for any hand-centered mechanisms, so any direct links with our results remain speculative.…”
Section: Threat-induced Freezingsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Second, the time course of startle-related inhibition based on TMS studies (Cantello et al, 2000) just precedes the corticospinal modulations reported here, which are restricted to 70 -80 ms after distractor ball appearance. Furthermore, Cantello et al (2000) did not provide (or search for) evidence for any hand-centered mechanisms, so any direct links with our results remain speculative. We therefore propose that, although fear-induced startle might play some role in the mechanism under investigation, our hand-centered modulation represents a later stage of selection between an appropriate avoidance/defensive response and the task-related response.…”
Section: Threat-induced Freezingsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Early PPR models imply abnormal neuronal responses in V1 to IPS [5e7, 37]. Accordingly, in PPR-positive patients, the repetitive visual stimulation might have elicited altered V-PAS responses due to abnormal V1 or visual thalamus excitability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%