1994
DOI: 10.3109/02813439409003687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a simplified programme for dietary treatment of hyperlipdaemia in primary health care

Abstract: Objective -To evaluate a model for dietary treatment of hyperlipidaemia in primary health care.Design -The participating men received their initial dietary instructions from a dietitian, in a group, together with their wives. Thereafter the nurses used a checklist to evaluate dietary compliance throughout the year. The participants completed a simplified food frequency questionnaire six times during the study period.Results -Throughout the year the total body weight, body mass index (BMI), total cholesterol, L… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dietary strategy in this study gave results consistent with a simplified model (dietary instructions combined with dietary compliance) (Nydahl et al, 1994), intensive nutrition counseling (Rhodes et al, 1996;Hebert et al, 1999;Angkatavanich et al, 2001), nutrition education combined with dietary counseling (Timlin et al, 2002), dietary intervention (Lopes et al, 1999), effective strategies, and a health promotion program (Aree et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The dietary strategy in this study gave results consistent with a simplified model (dietary instructions combined with dietary compliance) (Nydahl et al, 1994), intensive nutrition counseling (Rhodes et al, 1996;Hebert et al, 1999;Angkatavanich et al, 2001), nutrition education combined with dietary counseling (Timlin et al, 2002), dietary intervention (Lopes et al, 1999), effective strategies, and a health promotion program (Aree et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%