2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a single footshock followed by situational reminders on HPA axis and behaviour in the aversive context in male and female rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
9
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is consistent with findings from numerous other studies that have shown greater glucocorticoid reactivity by female, compared with male, rodents (Weinstock et al 1998;Bowman et al 2006;Louvart et al 2006). There appear to be species differences in stressor reactivity, however, in that men tend to exhibit greater glucocorticoid responses to stress than women (for a comprehensive review, see Kudielka and Kirschbaum 2005).…”
Section: Correlations Between Cort and Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This observation is consistent with findings from numerous other studies that have shown greater glucocorticoid reactivity by female, compared with male, rodents (Weinstock et al 1998;Bowman et al 2006;Louvart et al 2006). There appear to be species differences in stressor reactivity, however, in that men tend to exhibit greater glucocorticoid responses to stress than women (for a comprehensive review, see Kudielka and Kirschbaum 2005).…”
Section: Correlations Between Cort and Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Indeed, startle amplitude in the shocked mice which received reminders was progressively increased with repetitions of the reminders. These original studies have recently been extended to rats by Louvart et al (Louvart et al, 2005;Louvart et al, 2006), who modified the model by using fewer (three) contextual reminders but nonetheless again demonstrated that a single exposure to inescapable footshock followed by brief weekly contextual reminders persistently increased anxiety-like behavior, altered social behavior, and increased avoidance, further demonstrating consistency between responses in this rodent [TS+R] paradigm and PTSD. In the Pynoos et al time-dependent sensitization model the repeated contextual reminders were demonstrated to play a necessary role in the progressive development of persistently increased startle and other parameters characteristic of PTSD, consistent with evidence that re-exposure to distinctive cues which had been present during a traumatic event can play an important role in development of chronic PTSD (Pitman, 1988) and that the subset of individuals who develop PTSD following trauma exhibit a progressive increase in startle reactivity over the months following the traumatic event (Shalev et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…First, Carobrez et al (2002) observed that previous exposure to socialdefeat caused, 1 week later, a reduction of the corticosterone response to an acute dose of endotoxin. Second, exposure to one single severe shock followed by weekly exposure to situational reminders (see Section 3.2) resulted in a normal corticosterone response to restraint stress in males and a reduced corticosterone response during the post-stress period in females, as compared to respective control animals (Louvart et al, 2006). Quite interestingly, exposure to shock and situational reminders reduced resting CRF gene expression in the PVN in both males and females.…”
Section: Response To Heterotypic Stressorsmentioning
confidence: 95%