2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11055-006-0087-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a sound source moving in a vertical plane on postural responses in humans

Abstract: The effects of moving sound sources on postural responses were studied. Sound source movement was simulated by sequential switching of loudspeakers located along an arch positioned in the sagittal plane relative to the subject. The total durations of the sound stimulus movement were 1.6, 3.2, and 4.8 sec. Signals of 1.6 and 3.2 sec led to decreases in the mean amplitude of oscillogram oscillations in the sagittal and frontal planes. Stabilogram curves averaged for all subjects for the signal of duration 4.8 se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Directionality of a moving sound source alone does not seem to matter in reducing sway; clockwise and counterclockwise moving auditory stimuli reduce postural sway variability (Tanaka et al 2001). However, sound that moves from the front toward the back of participants can result in participants leaning toward the approaching sound (Agaeva et al 2006), which helps explain why Soames and Raper reported a destabilizing effect of a sound stimulus that jumped between speakers anterior and posterior to participants (Soames and Raper 1992). In the current study, we used headphones to eliminate the possibility of the noise stimulus indicating a single fixed or moving location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Directionality of a moving sound source alone does not seem to matter in reducing sway; clockwise and counterclockwise moving auditory stimuli reduce postural sway variability (Tanaka et al 2001). However, sound that moves from the front toward the back of participants can result in participants leaning toward the approaching sound (Agaeva et al 2006), which helps explain why Soames and Raper reported a destabilizing effect of a sound stimulus that jumped between speakers anterior and posterior to participants (Soames and Raper 1992). In the current study, we used headphones to eliminate the possibility of the noise stimulus indicating a single fixed or moving location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The existing research supports the idea that balance control can incorporate auditory information (Ross & Balasubramaniam, 2015; Dozza, Horak, & Chiari, 2007; Hegeman, Honegger, Kupper, & Allum, 2005; Tanaka, Kojima, Takeda, Ino, & Ifukube, 2001). However, there is no consensus on which types of sounds reduce sway (Ross & Balasubramaniam, 2015; Dozza et al, 2007; Hegeman, Honegger, Kupper, & Allum, 2005; Tanaka et al, 2001) and which increase sway (Agaeva, Al’tman, Kirillova, 2006; Soames & Raper, 1992). It is clear that balance control mechanisms can use auditory information including multisensory compensation and a dynamically changing sensory strategy (Dozza et al, 2007; Forti, Filipponi, Di Berardino, Barozzi, & Cesarani, 2010).…”
Section: Postural Control and Entrainmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is well known that dynamic changes in sound, such as sound image movements, may influence human posture [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. Certain kinds of sound movements evoke human body movements, a phenomenon that has occasionally been called "auditory kinesthesis."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%