2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-018-2582-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of acclimatisation on behavioural repeatability in two behaviour assays of the guppy Poecilia reticulata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The training phase also allowed individuals with different sensitivity to risk, and/or stress to habituate to the experimental procedure and potentially reduce the confounding effect of coping styles (Zidar et al 2017). A related benefit was that estimates of repeatability can be improved with greater acclimatisation time, as shown for other species (O'Neill et al 2018).…”
Section: Phase 1: Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The training phase also allowed individuals with different sensitivity to risk, and/or stress to habituate to the experimental procedure and potentially reduce the confounding effect of coping styles (Zidar et al 2017). A related benefit was that estimates of repeatability can be improved with greater acclimatisation time, as shown for other species (O'Neill et al 2018).…”
Section: Phase 1: Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that continuous exposure to stimuli over a series of consecutive days can decrease the level of behavioural reactivity due to habituation. Long acclimatisation could reduce fish activity levels ( O’Neill et al, 2018 ), decrease exploration rates and increase individual’s boldness over time ( Adriaenssens & Johnsson, 2011 ). The effects of acclimatisation have also been reported on aggressiveness; in fact, the number of aggressive interactions can decrease significantly across trials ( Roy & Bhat, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archerfish, like other animals perhaps especially other wild caught animals-which may be slower or less likely to engage with novel objects than captive-bred or urban individuals (Gajdon et al 2004;Jarjour et al 2020)-can require extended periods to acclimate and train (Archard and Braithwaite 2010;Patton and Braithwaite 2015). Acclimation can play an important role in the expression of behaviours and performance in behavioural assays (O'Neill et al 2018), and sufficient acclimation may help reduce the issues inherent in measuring cognition in the laboratory (Webster and Rutz 2020). Cognition studies may be particularly susceptible to factors affecting stress and environmental conditions which can affect measures (Pritchard et al 2016), and this is especially important when exploring consistent individual variation (Strand et al 2010;Rowe and Healy 2014;Griffin et al 2015;White et al 2017;Boogert et al 2018;da Silva et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this assay, each fish was recorded for 10 min, and the proportion of time spent in the open, where the fish was more than 1 body length away from the plant shelter or corners of the tank, was recorded. We used a 24-h acclimation period prior to conducting the assay, informed by our previous work with this species in a similar setup (Jones et al 2018); while a single measurement per individual is not ideal for a labile trait (Biro and Stamps 2010), suitable acclimation periods can provide more robust estimates of individual behavioural traits (Biro 2012), as demonstrated by high estimates of repeatability in guppy activity levels following acclimation (O'Neill et al 2018). To minimize observer bias, blinded methods were used; specifically, a hypothesis naïve scorer was used to score videos of the behavioural assays.…”
Section: Behavioural Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%