2020
DOI: 10.1123/apaq.2019-0108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Acute Aerobic Exercise on Executive Function in Children With and Without Learning Disability: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: This study examined the effects of acute aerobic exercise on sustained attention and discriminatory ability of children with and without learning disabilities (LD). Fifty-one children with LD and 49 typically developing children were randomly assigned to exercise or control groups. The participants in the exercise groups performed a 30-min session of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise, whereas the control groups watched a running/exercise-related video. Neuropsychological tasks, the Daueraufmerksamkeit sustai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further exclusion in the last round included studies that (1) the full text was not written in English ( N = 3); (2) did not meet the participants' criteria ( N = 2); (3) did not meet the intervention's criteria ( N = 2); and (4) had incomplete data ( N = 3). Finally, 10 eligible trials were included in the review (Cofini et al, 2018; Deng, 2017; Emami Kashfi et al, 2019; Flaugnacco et al, 2015; Huang et al, 2020; Kouhbanani et al, 2020; Masoudi et al, 2016; Mohammadi et al, 2009; Reynolds et al, 2003; Westendorp et al, 2014) (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Further exclusion in the last round included studies that (1) the full text was not written in English ( N = 3); (2) did not meet the participants' criteria ( N = 2); (3) did not meet the intervention's criteria ( N = 2); and (4) had incomplete data ( N = 3). Finally, 10 eligible trials were included in the review (Cofini et al, 2018; Deng, 2017; Emami Kashfi et al, 2019; Flaugnacco et al, 2015; Huang et al, 2020; Kouhbanani et al, 2020; Masoudi et al, 2016; Mohammadi et al, 2009; Reynolds et al, 2003; Westendorp et al, 2014) (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to PM exercises' characteristics as an intervention, participants, and therapists were not blinded in most of the studies. According to the ROB2 assessment, six studies were rated as “High risk” (Emami Kashfi et al, 2019; Huang et al, 2020; Kouhbanani et al, 2020; Masoudi et al, 2016; Mohammadi et al, 2009; Reynolds et al, 2003) and one was judged as “Unclear risk” (Flaugnacco et al, 2015). Three studies assessed by ROBINS‐I and RoB2 for cluster‐randomization had a “moderate risk of bias” (Cofini et al, 2018; Westendorp et al, 2014) and a “serious risk of bias” (Deng, 2017), hence were not akin to the randomized controlled trials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Studies in which physical exertion is measured and additionally linked to executive functions could provide more information about this suspected mediation effect. Like the long-term PA interventions, the short-term effects can only be meaningful if the experimental manipulation (e.g., monitoring the real-time heart rate or subjective effort) was successful [ 19 ]. To our knowledge, no systematic review has yet considered a manipulation check in assessing the effects of single bouts of physical exertion on executive function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%