2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Age and Gender on Dynamic Stability During Stair Descent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[4950] Variation in step geometry, stair steepness, absence of hand rails, and short flights have been shown to be associated with increased risk of falls. [51–54] More research is needed on safe stair design, gender differences in stair negotiation [5557], and how these factors may be accounted for in stair design with affordance for all users. [58]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4950] Variation in step geometry, stair steepness, absence of hand rails, and short flights have been shown to be associated with increased risk of falls. [51–54] More research is needed on safe stair design, gender differences in stair negotiation [5557], and how these factors may be accounted for in stair design with affordance for all users. [58]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports have highlighted many gender differences during locomotion, including differences in gait speed [29] and running [30], with men exhibiting a higher velocity than women. Gait is more variable in men compared to women during a dual task [31], and women present a longer stride duration than men during stair descent [32]. Women, when ageing, report less self-confidence and greater cautiousness than men in their ability to manage stairs [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The danger they are referring to lies with the feeling of reduced stability they experience during their journeys. Generally, older people have weaker limbs and sway more than younger people (Hsue and Su, 2014), hence they present reduced balance in static environments (Era et al, 2006). One would expect this behaviour to be amplified when they negotiate dynamic environments, such as a moving bus, but this has not been investigated before the present study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%