2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of age and mannanoligosaccharides supplementation on production of volatile fatty acids in the caecum of rabbits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences among the previous values may also be due to difficulties in the measurement of starch in the ileal contents of the rabbit due to the low quantities of samples available and variable intake pattern of rabbits fed ad libitum, thereby leading to high inter-individual variability (E20%). From 6 to 10 weeks of age, VFA production by rabbits was similar, although there were changes in the fermentation pattern, with a higher proportion of butyrate and lower proportion of acetate being observed in agreement with previous studies (Gidenne et al, 2002;Guedes et al, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The differences among the previous values may also be due to difficulties in the measurement of starch in the ileal contents of the rabbit due to the low quantities of samples available and variable intake pattern of rabbits fed ad libitum, thereby leading to high inter-individual variability (E20%). From 6 to 10 weeks of age, VFA production by rabbits was similar, although there were changes in the fermentation pattern, with a higher proportion of butyrate and lower proportion of acetate being observed in agreement with previous studies (Gidenne et al, 2002;Guedes et al, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Several authors investigated the effect of MOS v. antibiotics on in vivo rabbit performance (mortality and growth rates, feed intake), but did not find significant differences (Fonseca et al, 2004;Pinheiro et al, 2004;Mourao et al, 2006). Recently, Guedes et al (2009) found that the addition of 2.0 g/kg MOS to the diet increased volatile fatty acids (VFAs) concentration in the caecum of growing rabbits, but Pinheiro et al (2009) observed that 1.0 g MOS/kg was not able to reduce the negative effect of low fibre diets on rabbit growth performance. However, all the above-mentioned studies (Fonseca et al, 2004;Pinheiro et al, 2004 andMourao et al, 2006;Guedes et al, 2009) showed that the addition of MOS to the diets resulted in a better intestinal integrity and had a protective effect against common pathogens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Recently, Guedes et al (2009) found that the addition of 2.0 g/kg MOS to the diet increased volatile fatty acids (VFAs) concentration in the caecum of growing rabbits, but Pinheiro et al (2009) observed that 1.0 g MOS/kg was not able to reduce the negative effect of low fibre diets on rabbit growth performance. However, all the above-mentioned studies (Fonseca et al, 2004;Pinheiro et al, 2004 andMourao et al, 2006;Guedes et al, 2009) showed that the addition of MOS to the diets resulted in a better intestinal integrity and had a protective effect against common pathogens. MOS are able to bind the mannose receptors on the type 1 fimbriae of some pathogen bacteria (as E. coli and Salmonella enteritidis) in order to prevent their attachment to intestinal mucosa (Firon et al, 1983;Spring et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Prebiotics and in particular mannan‐oligosaccharides (MOS), derived from the outer cell wall of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , are considered a promising alternative to antibiotics (Kocher, 2006). Several studies (Fonseca et al., 2004; Pinheiro et al., 2004, 2009; Mourao et al., 2006; Guedes et al., 2009) have shown that the addition of MOS to the diets results in a better intestinal integrity and has a protective effect against common pathogens. MOS are able to bind the mannose receptors on the type 1 fimbriae of some pathogen bacteria (such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella enteritidis ) in order to prevent their attachment to intestinal mucosa (Firon et al., 1983; Spring et al., 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%