2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-019-1132-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of alternate-day fasting on body weight and dyslipidaemia in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract: BackgroundAlternate-day fasting (ADF) is a novel diet therapy that may achieve reduction in body weight and improvement of dyslipidaemia, but the impact of this diet on patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of ADF on the body weight and lipid profile of individuals with NAFLD.MethodsNAFLD patients (n = 271) were randomised to the ADF group, time-restricted feeding (TRF) group, or the control group and subjected to the respecti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
189
1
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
189
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon further review and quality assessment, we found 21 studies that met the topic of interest. Among the 21 studies [23,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45], two were excluded for meta-analysis [26,27]. Their main results have been summarized in Supplementary Materials Table S3.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Upon further review and quality assessment, we found 21 studies that met the topic of interest. Among the 21 studies [23,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45], two were excluded for meta-analysis [26,27]. Their main results have been summarized in Supplementary Materials Table S3.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the subgroup analysis according to metabolically healthy status, the subgroup with five studies including participants with metabolic abnormality [28,[33][34][35]38] showed significant reduction of body weight (MD, −3.19; 95% CI, −4.62 to −1.77; I 2 , 0%) while the subgroup with seven studies including healthy participants [31,[38][39][40][42][43][44] did not show significant change of body weight (MD, 0.17; 95% CI, −0.81 to 1.15; I 2 , 0%). In sensitivity analysis, one study [33] showed a significant effect on result. When it was removed, statistical significance disappeared (MD, −0.01; 95% CI, −0.95 to 0.93, Supplementary Materials Figure S2A).…”
Section: Effect Of Tre On Obesity and Body Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intriguingly, autophagy induction in NAFLD and NASH has been seriously considered as a key treatment regimen [86]. Already, caloric restriction, time-restricted feeding [87], and exercise which are known autophagic stimuli, at least in part, underlie some of their beneficial consequences in liver dysfunction and steatosis [88,89]. Similarly, enhancing autophagy through drugs metformin or the disaccharide trehalose, thyromimetics, green tea and caffeine to enhance lipophagy and beta-oxidation have also shown promising anti-steatogenic effects [36,88,90,91].…”
Section: Implication Of Pparα-lysosomal Crosstalk In Nafldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomized trials show that both a 24-h fast and a TRF (≈16 h) fast result in important biological changes in humans that should lead to extensive health improvements such as chronic disease prevention when practiced repeatedly over a length of years [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. For example, a 24-h fast reduced the microbiome-related cardiac risk factor, trimethylamine N-oxide [10] and induced various changes potentially related to autophagy and energy management [9,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similarities and differences of a caloric restriction diet, the ketogenic diet, and a fasting diet are considered by Paoli, indicating many co-incident physiological influences of these three distinct dietary approaches [6]. Whether TRF produces the vast array of potential benefits in humans that animal models suggest that it might remains to be seen given that the few published randomized controlled trials of TRF are primarily small pilot studies of <50 participants [11][12][13][14][15], with one larger trial examining alternate-day fasting versus TRF and comparing these to controls [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%