2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of alumina-blasting pressure on the bonding to super/ultra-translucent zirconia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
28
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
10
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The null hypotheses were therefore rejected. As previously reported in the literature, 30,31 the MDP‐based AC and the MDP‐based SAC cements displayed statistically similar performances and showed the highest SBS values with both the zirconia substrates. These results could be attributed to the chemical interaction between the hydroxyl groups of the zirconium oxide layer and the phosphate ester monomers of the MDP at the interfacial level 32 : each phosphate group binds to one (tridentate chelating mode) or three zirconium atoms (tridentate bridging mode) creating zirconium phosphate, a thermally and hydrolytically stable zirconium salt 33,34 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The null hypotheses were therefore rejected. As previously reported in the literature, 30,31 the MDP‐based AC and the MDP‐based SAC cements displayed statistically similar performances and showed the highest SBS values with both the zirconia substrates. These results could be attributed to the chemical interaction between the hydroxyl groups of the zirconium oxide layer and the phosphate ester monomers of the MDP at the interfacial level 32 : each phosphate group binds to one (tridentate chelating mode) or three zirconium atoms (tridentate bridging mode) creating zirconium phosphate, a thermally and hydrolytically stable zirconium salt 33,34 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The null hypotheses were therefore rejected. As previously reported in the literature, 30,31 the MDP-based AC and the MDP-based SAC cements displayed statistically similar performances and showed the highest SBS values with both the Note: Same superscript letters indicate no statistically significant differences among the levels of the factor "Cement" (reading horizontally). Same subscript numbers indicate no statistically significant differences among the levels of the factor "Substrate" (reading vertically Note: Standardized residuals are also shown in brackets, as independently calculated within each different zirconia substrate group (3Y-TZP and 5Y-PSZ columns) or pooling both zirconia substrates together (overall columns).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The present study aimed to further explore the effect of translucency on the µSBS of zirconia with different cusp inclinations. SARC was chosen since it has multiple advantages when bonding to zirconia, including application simplicity [30], low postoperative tooth sensitivity [31], moisture tolerance, and comparable or even greater bond strength than other materials [32,33]. The recommended time for curing resin cement of the manufacturer is 20 s. However, 20 s was considered insufficient when bonding was performed beneath zirconia [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of aesthetic properties and manufacturing technology of dental zirconia ceramics, they are widely used in dental restorations in the last decade [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. However, the failures of zirconia restorations may be induced by inappropriate design and manufacturing, improper preparation of abutment teeth, low fatigue performance and unique hydrothermal aging behaviour of zirconia ceramics [1,4,[8][9][10][11][12][13]. The influence of the previous two factors on the lifetime of zirconia restorations has been widely discussed [4,[12][13][14], but the interactions of the last two factors is less known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the failures of zirconia restorations may be induced by inappropriate design and manufacturing, improper preparation of abutment teeth, low fatigue performance and unique hydrothermal aging behaviour of zirconia ceramics [1,4,[8][9][10][11][12][13]. The influence of the previous two factors on the lifetime of zirconia restorations has been widely discussed [4,[12][13][14], but the interactions of the last two factors is less known. Therefore, systematically assessing the effects of long-term fatigue behaviour and hydrothermal aging behaviour on the service lifetime of zirconia dental devices is a necessary task for the continued development of zirconia dental application [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%