2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of an over-ground exoskeleton on external knee moments during stance phase of gait in healthy adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, KJD could be a promising, clinically available therapy for OA patients, based on the reduction of mechanical stimuli to prevent OA development. In addition, exoskeletons have also shown promise in modifying the biomechanical environment of the knee in OA patients (Mcgibbon et al, 2017).…”
Section: Responders To Mechanical Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, KJD could be a promising, clinically available therapy for OA patients, based on the reduction of mechanical stimuli to prevent OA development. In addition, exoskeletons have also shown promise in modifying the biomechanical environment of the knee in OA patients (Mcgibbon et al, 2017).…”
Section: Responders To Mechanical Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 3D inverse dynamics model of the lower-leg and foot (McGibbon et al, 2017) was used to compute net forces at the knee joint. Then, a sagittal plane model of the knee (O'Connor et al, 1989), as shown in Figure 2, was used to resolve muscle tendon forces, cruciate ligament forces, and joint contact forces in the sagittal plane.…”
Section: Lower Leg and Knee Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not surprising, considering the device has mass and inertia to overcome, and has some inherent stiffness, which has been documented in a biomechanical study of healthy adults using the Keeogo [34]. Even though it was found in healthy subjects that gait speed did not differ significantly between trials when wearing and not wearing the Keeogo, the small difference that did exist (.06 m/s) when extrapolated to a 6MWTwould result in a distance deficit of − 21.6 m. This is approximately the deficit we saw for the performance effect (− 22 m) for patients with MS 6MWT when initially using Keeogo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%