2019 16th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technolo 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ecti-con47248.2019.8955437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Antenna Orientation in Ultra Wideband Indoor Positioning System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because varies according to the distance , a normalized bias error = is used in the calibration. The calibration should be performed at multiple calibration points, as shown in Figure 3 , to reflect the error characteristics of the UWB transceiver, which vary according to the direction of the signal [ 34 ]. is computed as the average of the normalized biases measured at the calibration points as follows: where , represent the true and estimated position of the i th calibration point, denotes the distance between the robot and , and is the number of calibration points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because varies according to the distance , a normalized bias error = is used in the calibration. The calibration should be performed at multiple calibration points, as shown in Figure 3 , to reflect the error characteristics of the UWB transceiver, which vary according to the direction of the signal [ 34 ]. is computed as the average of the normalized biases measured at the calibration points as follows: where , represent the true and estimated position of the i th calibration point, denotes the distance between the robot and , and is the number of calibration points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each node has four anchors at a fixed distance, and a tag is placed between them. In UWB-based devices, the antenna orientation affects the positioning performance, and researchers have found that a vertical orientation yields better results than a horizontal orientation [42]. Therefore, we placed the antennas of the four anchors in a vertical orientation, with the antennas of anchors 3 and 4 rotated by 90 degrees.…”
Section: Uwb-based Relative Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the distance ranging from 20 m, the MAPE in distance reached 3 m. There were no distance measurements when the tag was placed horizontally. Chansamood et al [27] investigated the impact of antenna orientation between the initiator and responder. The authors claimed that the highest range could be achieved when the initiator and receiver were placed vertically.…”
Section: Ranging Experiments In Dual Communication Modementioning
confidence: 99%