2022
DOI: 10.3390/electronics11244098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Approach–Avoidance Swiping Interactions on the Valence Estimation Using Tablet AAT

Abstract: Bodily activity may influence subjects’ cognitive processing against embodied cognition. Approaching positive objects and avoiding negative ones facilitate the cognitive processing of emotional information by enhancing valence estimation. The effect may be termed the “Approaching positive and Avoiding negative Compatibility Effect (AACE)”. Implicit approach–avoidance behavior towards stimuli can be measured using the Approach–Avoidance Task (AAT). We recently expanded a touchscreen tablet AAT which seems a mor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the body becomes the primary frame of reference during the interactions. For example, emphasizing distal and proximal device endpoints regarding the body when swiping (e.g., Eiler et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2022), or dragging pictures of food (e.g., Kahveci et al, 2021;Meule et al, 2020) or threatening stimuli such as spiders (e.g., Rinck et al, 2021;Van Alebeek et al, 2023). Alternatively, interactions have also been implemented with an object as the primary frame of reference e.g., by using metaphorical self-representations such as a 13 manikin or the users' name, moving toward or away from a fixed picture, or vice versa (e.g., Meule et al, 2020).…”
Section: Action-goal Representations and Approach -Avoidance Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the body becomes the primary frame of reference during the interactions. For example, emphasizing distal and proximal device endpoints regarding the body when swiping (e.g., Eiler et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2022), or dragging pictures of food (e.g., Kahveci et al, 2021;Meule et al, 2020) or threatening stimuli such as spiders (e.g., Rinck et al, 2021;Van Alebeek et al, 2023). Alternatively, interactions have also been implemented with an object as the primary frame of reference e.g., by using metaphorical self-representations such as a 13 manikin or the users' name, moving toward or away from a fixed picture, or vice versa (e.g., Meule et al, 2020).…”
Section: Action-goal Representations and Approach -Avoidance Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%