1992
DOI: 10.2307/3236004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of artificial plant cover on plant colonization of a bare peat surface

Abstract: Abstract. This paper describes the effect of artificial plant cover on plant colonization of a bare peat surface, resulting from peat harvesting. Plant species colonization was compared on plots supplied with plastic models simulating Vaccinium vitis‐idaea plants and plots without this artificial cover. After two growing seasons, species composition and total biomass of the established plant cover were similar in the two plot types. However, the number of established seedlings in the plots with artificial cov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining cutaway peatland has no vegetation or seed bank [18] [33] [42] [43]. Natural vegetation succession of cutaway peatlands is extremely slow process due to nutrient deficiencies and imbalances and the loose peat surface [44] [45] and abandoned sites can still after 20 years consist of mainly bare peat surface [43]. Our results confirmed the rather poor ability of cutaway peatlands to recover after peat extraction has ceased (see e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The remaining cutaway peatland has no vegetation or seed bank [18] [33] [42] [43]. Natural vegetation succession of cutaway peatlands is extremely slow process due to nutrient deficiencies and imbalances and the loose peat surface [44] [45] and abandoned sites can still after 20 years consist of mainly bare peat surface [43]. Our results confirmed the rather poor ability of cutaway peatlands to recover after peat extraction has ceased (see e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Thus, although the immigration potential of mosses onto extracted peatlands is relatively high, colonization is, however, usually very scarce [49], indicating that factors other than spore supply restrict moss colonization [18] [33]. In many studies the availability of mineral nutrients, in particular P, is reported to have had a crucial effect on both plant coverage and species composition of the early-successional stage of extracted peatlands [44] [50] [51]. Additionally, there may be also other compounds besides mineral nutrients in ash that promote germination of pioneer plants, since even ten-fold coverage of pioneer mosses have been observed on ash-fertilized areas compared to the areas with PK-fertilizer application [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fertilization with fertilizer containing P and K enhances the formation of vegetation on cutaway peatland (Salonen andLaaksonen 1994, Huotari et al 2007). The annual soil CO 2 emis sions due to decomposition of the remaining peat layer from the same afforested cutaway peatland area (Aitoneva, Kihniö) was measured to be 381 g C m -2 a -1 15-43 years after stand establishment, on average (Mäkiranta et al 2007).…”
Section: Biomass Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reintroducing Sphagnum with companion plant species is another alternative to create a more favorable, humid microclimate. Salonen (1992) showed experimentally that more plants have naturally recolonized barren peat fields under artificial plant covers than on bare peat. He associated this improved recolonization with increased moisture conditions and lower temperatures at the peat surface created by the artificial plant cover.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%