Speech Prosody 2014 2014
DOI: 10.21437/speechprosody.2014-170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of auditory, visual and gestural input on the perceptual learning of tones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to test application, raw values in the f0 contours were converted to the OMe scale, proposed by [13], using the formula…”
Section: Measuring F0 Distribution Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to test application, raw values in the f0 contours were converted to the OMe scale, proposed by [13], using the formula…”
Section: Measuring F0 Distribution Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measurements were conducted on the continuous pitch contours modeled by Momel algorithm using a Praat plugin [9]. They were normalized to eliminate individual differences using the OMe (Octave-Median) scale [10]. In addition, (8) speech rate and (9) mean intensity were also included.…”
Section: Acoustic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters were captured by both global and local pitch movements of each sentence. Pitch-related parameters were normalized to eliminate individual differences using the OMe (Octave-Median) scale [15] by applying the following equation:…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%