2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of balance training with visual feedback during mechanically unperturbed standing on postural corrective responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings point to the fact that dynamic measures of postural control are perhaps more responsive to effects incurred by a 20-session mat Pilates program, contrary to the static measurements adopted in the present study. This hypothesis coincides with Sayenko et al 31 , who verified that proprioceptive muscle training had the potential to increase only dynamic postural responses. In this case, we suggest that further studies measure, besides the static postural alignment, functional variables related to dynamic postural balance, and also compare the effects of mat Pilates to Pilates performed with equipment for this purpose.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These findings point to the fact that dynamic measures of postural control are perhaps more responsive to effects incurred by a 20-session mat Pilates program, contrary to the static measurements adopted in the present study. This hypothesis coincides with Sayenko et al 31 , who verified that proprioceptive muscle training had the potential to increase only dynamic postural responses. In this case, we suggest that further studies measure, besides the static postural alignment, functional variables related to dynamic postural balance, and also compare the effects of mat Pilates to Pilates performed with equipment for this purpose.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…One potential explanation for this finding is that feedback that confirms that participants are improving and mastering the task (i.e., feedback showing that they are better able to keep the COG/COP within the target lines with practice) may serve to promote self-efficacy (Wright et al 2016) and reduce anxiety associated with the platform movement. Thus, improved self-efficacy and balance confidence might explain some of the non-specific improvements in balance control that have previously been observed following balance training with concurrent visual feedback (Sihvonen et al 2004a;Sihvonen et al 2004b;Sayenko et al 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On the proprioceptive side, muscle, aponeurosis and tendon receptors (e.g., neuromuscular spindles and Golgi tendon organs) provide real-time information on the degree of muscle fibers stretching and tension level, together with body segments spatial position (Dimitriou and Edin 2010). On the exteroceptive side, vision and pressure are the most important sensory components for force modulation (Sayenko et al 2012;Lin and Yang 2011). A continuous information transfer among sensory components, cerebral cortex and effector organs takes place during contraction.…”
Section: Donementioning
confidence: 99%