2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-018-02230-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of ball milling on the structure of cotton cellulose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
139
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 309 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
8
139
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that ball milling affects the morphology of cellulose, but it can also alter the chemical structure. Even a short dry milling for 15 min can reduce the crystallinity and molar mass of cellulose . Under our optimized reaction conditions, cellulose was milled for only 2 min in a wet state, and the effect of this treatment was rather small.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is well known that ball milling affects the morphology of cellulose, but it can also alter the chemical structure. Even a short dry milling for 15 min can reduce the crystallinity and molar mass of cellulose . Under our optimized reaction conditions, cellulose was milled for only 2 min in a wet state, and the effect of this treatment was rather small.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Even a short dry milling for 15 min can reduce the crystallinity and molar mass of cellulose. [30] Under our optimized reactionconditions, cellulose was milled for only 2min in aw et state, and the effect of this treatment was rathers mall. The crystallinity index (measured by FTIR spectroscopy) was reduced from 0.98 to 0.88.…”
Section: Experimental Designa Nd Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The crystallinity index Cr.I. % (sometimes called Segal index) 17 of hardwood samples was calculated from diffraction intensity data using the following empirical equation 1 18,19,20,21,22 : Where I 200 is the total intensity of diffraction of the (200) lattice peak at a 2 ~22.6 for cellulose I (I) and of the (020) lattice peak for cellulose II at a 2 ~21.6 , and I am is the intensity of diffraction of amorphous cellulose content at a 2 ~18 for cellulose I (I) and at a 2 ~16 for cellulose II (minimum intensity in this region) 18 .…”
Section: Crystallinity Index Crimentioning
confidence: 99%