2019
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2018.08.0306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Biomass Removal Levels on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Reserves in Conifer‐Dominated, Coarse‐Textured Sites in Northern Ontario: 20‐Year Results

Abstract: Core Ideas Biomass removal trials targeted soils sensitive to nutrient removal (shallow to bedrock and infertile sands). 14 long‐term sites (42 plots per treatment) were used to evaluate C and nutrient reserves 20 years post‐harvest. After 20 years, soil C, N, and K reserves did not differ between pre‐harvest levels and SO and FT. Soil reserves of FTB treatments remained significantly lower than the pre‐harvest levels. Jack pine and black spruce declined in height on FTB on sandy sites; there were no differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with the simulation result from Wei et al (2003) where there was no much difference in long-term site productivity between WTH and SOH (equivalent to our treatments W and S, respectively) in lodgepole pine forests in the same region. It is also consistent with the results from the experiment involving residue removal in 14 experiments in Canada (Morris et al 2019). However, the lack of significant difference in tree growth between S and W treatments may be due to the following reasons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result is consistent with the simulation result from Wei et al (2003) where there was no much difference in long-term site productivity between WTH and SOH (equivalent to our treatments W and S, respectively) in lodgepole pine forests in the same region. It is also consistent with the results from the experiment involving residue removal in 14 experiments in Canada (Morris et al 2019). However, the lack of significant difference in tree growth between S and W treatments may be due to the following reasons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Various case studies have examined the effects of logging residue loading on soil productivity (Eisenbies et al 2009;Walmsley et al 2009;Wei et al 1997) and tree growth (Nettles et al 2015;Wei et al 2012). Regional experiments investigating the impacts of harvesting and site management on forest production have also found the importance of logging residue from tropical to boreal forests (Morris et al 2019;Nambiar and Kallio 2008). However, in spite of the growing interest in this subject, the effects of forest logging residue loading cannot be generalized in terms of the amount of residue loading, growth dynamics, and site characteristics (Clarke et al 2015;Egnell 2017;Thiffault et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although only the relative magnitude of growth response was explored in this study (i.e., calculation of response ratios to make findings comparable across multiple sites), results suggest that jack pine stands may be more suitable for wood ash amendment than other conifer species. Benefits of wood ash amendment to jack pine stands should be further explored, especially given previous research demonstrating that jack pine growth and nutritional status are susceptible to increasing intensity of biomass removals (Morris et al, ; Thiffault, Paré, Bélanger, Munson, & Marquis, ). In addition, although spruce species have the greatest total tree volume in Canada (~22,383 million m 3 ; Natural Resources Canada, ), pine species are the third most abundant nationwide (~5,611 million m 3 ; Natural Resources Canada, ), and in Ontario, jack pine are the second most harvested tree species by volume (~3,570,185 m 3 ; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources & Forestry, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an assertion would need to be tested via nutrient addition experimentation. Regardless, these findings support a proposed mechanism for the sensitivity of P losses, and relative lack thereof for N, following disturbance such as harvesting in high latitude coniferous forests (Morris et al 2019). In the context of the forests examined in the current study, such a mechanism might increase P limitation, limiting the capacity for increased productivity stimulated by enhanced N cycling in these mesic forests in a warmer climate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%