2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11431-010-4128-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of bionic non-smooth surface on reducing soil resistance to disc ploughing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the difference between the model and the experiment was still less than 10%, in line with past FEM results [8,9,20]. Conforming to the general trend from past experiments, disc sample 9 gave the best performance with the highest draft force reduction of 15% compared to sample 1 which was just plain, and generally convex domes performed better than the plain ones and the concave dips [17,21]. The highest reduction of 15% is lower than that of the experiment which is at 19.5% reduction in horizontal force for sample 9 (Table 3 and Figure 8).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the difference between the model and the experiment was still less than 10%, in line with past FEM results [8,9,20]. Conforming to the general trend from past experiments, disc sample 9 gave the best performance with the highest draft force reduction of 15% compared to sample 1 which was just plain, and generally convex domes performed better than the plain ones and the concave dips [17,21]. The highest reduction of 15% is lower than that of the experiment which is at 19.5% reduction in horizontal force for sample 9 (Table 3 and Figure 8).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The specification of the sensor showed an allowable horizontal force of 5 kN. Signals from the sensor were conducted using Wave Book/6 linked to Wave Book/512 for the acquisition of the signal [17]. The DASYLAB program on a computer was used to read the output of the experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several organization and institutions have also been trying to modify, introduce, and develop various tillage implements, and to mention some are: FAO in 1950s (Goe, 1987); Alemaya University and Jimma Agricultural Technical School in Ethiopia between 1955 and 1965 (Canaday, 1959; UNDP Report); Chilallo Agricultural Development Unit (CADU) later changed to Arsi Rural Development Unit (ARDU) in 1968 (Anon., 1969(Anon., , 1970(Anon., , 1971 (Anon., 1981); the Agricultural Implements Research and Improvement Centre (AIRIC) in 1985 (Pathak, 1988); Selam Vocational Training and Farm Implements Production Center (Zaugg, 1992); The National Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Silsoe, UK (NIAE) (Starkey, 1988); Ethiopian Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) (Gebresenbet et al, 1997a); and International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) (Gebresenbet and Kaumbutho, 1997). Gebresenbet et al (1997a) showed that only a few researchers and farmers have been involved in innovation efforts in animal traction technology in Ethiopia with inadequate grasp of the context of the problems faced by many small farmers.…”
Section: Animal Drawn Implement (Ethiopian Ard Plough)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, а) со стойками 8 рабочих органов 2, выполненных в виде правосторонней 9 и левосторонней 10 плоскорежущих лап с продольными треугольными выступами 11 (рис. 2, б Для теоретического обоснования основных параметров рабочего органа пружинного выравнивателя необходимо определить условия его работы [14,15]. Качественному выравниванию почвы способствует анализ гребней и впадин образованных предыдущей почвообработкой.…”
unclassified